Names of bottle sizes: sources wanted

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Names of bottle sizes: sources wanted

Post by jdaw1 »

Wikipedia has a page on Wine bottles, the talk page of which says that there was a hoax about the names of some bottle sizes, that Wikipedia hoax since having been echoed elsewhere on the web. Wikipedia needs pre-2007 references, ideally from reputable printed books, listing the names of bottle sizes. If you have, please provide help.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3563
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Names of bottle sizes: sources wanted

Post by uncle tom »

The wiki table could benefit from having a column for port added. There is also an error in that it lists the Tappit Hen as 2.25L when in fact it is 2.1L.

I have also observed that some old magnums of port hold 1.65L instead of 1.5L, but no-one has yet been able to tell me whether this used to be universal, or when the practice ended.

Good literary references are thin on the ground for port bottle sizes, and writers of old on all subjects were notorious for copying each others mistakes.

Observations of actual practice is probably favourite here.

- And is it really desirable for the port trade to borrow French bottle names when filling large formats?

Perhaps the trade should agree some names of their own..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 19:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Names of bottle sizes: sources wanted

Post by AW77 »

There is an entry on "bottle sizes" in the Oxford Companion to Wine (3rd edition, page 98-99). You will find all the names there.
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
Post Reply