Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
Alex M
Niepoort LBV
Posts: 273
Joined: 10:14 Tue 12 May 2009

Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by Alex M »

If you could purchase one of the following, which would it be?

Taylors VVV 2000 x 3 for £370

Fonseca 1985 x 12 for £600

I'm looking for the wine that provides the best QPR and will still be improving in bottle for the next 20-30years. My initial thoughts were with the Fonseca.
User avatar
mosesbotbol
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 626
Joined: 18:54 Wed 18 Jul 2007
Location: Boston, USA

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by mosesbotbol »

Taylor all the way if this is an investment. You can personally thank me in 20 years. :) The VVV will command a pretty penny by then, not to mention by something special and exclusive.
F1 | Welsh Corgi | Did Someone Mention Port?
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Fonseca 1985 for me. Will start to drink at peak long before the Taylor and both will probably outlive you, so while the Taylor may be worth more, the Fonseca will likely give more enjoyment
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 21:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by KillerB »

I don't buy wine as a monetary investment, I buy it as an investment in my future enjoyment and I know how much I would enjoy twelve bottles of F85
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by DRT »

Alex M wrote:I'm looking for the wine that provides the best QPR and will still be improving in bottle for the next 20-30years.
Both of these wines will satisfy your second criteria, but the Fonseca undoubtedly provides a better QPR than the TVVV.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
g-man
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3429
Joined: 12:50 Wed 24 Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by g-man »

f85 for sure.

12 bottles of ambrosia
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4422
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by Glenn E. »

I too must vote for the F85. They're both great, but the F85 wins QPR hands down.

I don't have a lot of experience with VVV, but what experience I do have says that it's only marginally better (if at all) than the standard Taylor from the same year. Since it seems to cost about double, that gives it a lower QPR than even a standard Taylor.

As others have said, both will easily last another 30 years. The prices you quoted have the VVV at somewhat more than double the price of the F85, which makes it no contest. Plus by buying the F85 you get 12 bottles instead of 3.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
Portman
Fonseca LBV
Posts: 136
Joined: 16:24 Wed 01 Apr 2009
Location: Washington DC, USA

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by Portman »

Fonseca all the way! More wine, drinking sooner, and the qualitative difference is marginal.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by jdaw1 »

As an investment, the TVVV00. For pleasure, the F85.
User avatar
VJR
Cockburn’s Special Reserve
Posts: 49
Joined: 14:11 Thu 03 Dec 2009
Location: Bavaria

Re: Fonseca 85 or Taylors VVV 00

Post by VJR »

I remain skeptical of the 'superpremium' initiative from Taylors - this is no Nacional vineyard.
at maturity, I even doubt the VVV will ever be superior to the normal vintage...
I'd go for Fonseca 1985 - tried and proven... and great.
Cheers, Victor
Post Reply