"Port-like" but not technically port?

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
User avatar
WineLoverPT
Warre’s Warrior
Posts: 86
Joined: 07:42 Sat 05 Apr 2014
Location: Portalegre and Lisbon, Portugal

"Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by WineLoverPT »

I've been wondering this for a while, so I thought it about time to ask.

For a bottle of Port to be labelled "Port" it must satisfy a bunch of criteria, principle of which is, of course, that it's grown in the appropriate demarcated Douro region of Portugal.

But the techniques used in making a bottle of "Port" could, it seems to me, be deployed just about anywhere in the world. Reading the specs for some of the 2011s I see the "usual suspects" - nothing unique to the Douro - indeed, I could mix together 3 of my Alentejo bottles to produce a similar mix.

So, preamble concluded, the questions...
Are there other countries or regions producing what one could call Port if it were not forbidden to call it such?
If not, then why not?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by DRT »

Yes, port-like products are made extensively in the USA, Australia and South Africa and have been for at least a century.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
WineLoverPT
Warre’s Warrior
Posts: 86
Joined: 07:42 Sat 05 Apr 2014
Location: Portalegre and Lisbon, Portugal

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by WineLoverPT »

DRT wrote:Yes, port-like products are made extensively in the USA, Australia and South Africa and have been for at least a century.
Ah ha!
And what do they call them?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by DRT »

All three countries have used the name Port in the past but Australia and South Africa now use "Tawny" for most of the styles they produce. South Africa also use "Cape Vintage" and "Cape Vintage Reserve".

Some USA producers still insist on using the name "Port" but the practice seems to be becoming less culturally acceptable, particularly as some of those same producers campaign to protect the names of American areas of origin or styles.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

All the 'ports' I have tried from outside Portugal have been ghastly aberrations. Discuss.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by djewesbury »

LGTrotter wrote:All the 'ports' I have tried from outside Portugal have been ghastly aberrations. Discuss.
Last year and this at the BFT I tried some other 'Ports' and they were all, without exception, bleughhh. I have found some nice Maurys, which are like reasonably simple aged tawnies (perhaps the best ones approximate a 20YO). But I do NOT like Australian or American 'Ports'. I reserve judgement on Cape Reserve which I've never tried and which Alex seems to like.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 19:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by AW77 »

Just to complete the list of Ersatz ports, there is even one from the Ahr valley (a wine region south of Bonn) that is called "Omega 1868":
https://shop.wg-mayschoss.de/winzergeno ... omega-1868

It's probably made from a grape called Regent. I have not tasted it and would probably not spend 22 Euros on it.
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

I have had some very posh (OK, posh for me, which isn't too hard) Australian things and I just don't get them. I have a bottle of Penfolds Great Grandfather which was a generous gift but I can't bear to look at it much less drink it.
TLW
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 203
Joined: 06:51 Sat 01 Dec 2012

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by TLW »

LGTrotter wrote:All the 'ports' I have tried from outside Portugal have been ghastly aberrations. Discuss.
I opened a bottle of California "Port" some years ago. It resulted in one of only two times my iron-stomached, titanium livered, alcoholic friend poured a bottle down the drain.

The experiment will not be repeated in my house in my lifetime.
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3753
Joined: 13:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by PhilW »

LGTrotter wrote:All the 'ports' I have tried from outside Portugal have been ghastly aberrations. Discuss.
I've tried a few of the Australian ones, not tried the SA ones at all yet, though I do have one I received as a present.
So far I have not found the rubies to be anywhere near the standard of true ports, but I have been very impressed with one tawny - the Penfold Great Grandfather - not exactly like other tawnies, but I enjoyed it very much (enough to mention here (though do take into account that my preference is normally ruby rather than tawny for style). This meant I was surprised by your subsequent post...
LGTrotter wrote: have had some very posh (OK, posh for me, which isn't too hard) Australian things and I just don't get them. I have a bottle of Penfolds Great Grandfather which was a generous gift but I can't bear to look at it much less drink it.
But don't worry - I can help :wink:
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by jdaw1 »

Once, courtesy of Andy Velebil, I have had an impressive American pseudo-Port. Details forgotten: perhaps Derek or Alex can remember.
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3094
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by Andy Velebil »

jdaw1 wrote:Once, courtesy of Andy Velebil, I have had an impressive American pseudo-Port. Details forgotten: perhaps Derek or Alex can remember.
It was a 1/2 bottle of Roxo Port Cellars Ruby Tradicional. It used basically the same grapes as in many Douro Ports (Touriga Nacional, Tinta Roriz, Souzao, bar steward). It is from the Paso Robles wine area of California (A large wine growing region here about 1/2 way between Los Angeles and Napa). Served double blind, no one guessed it was not from the Douro. The most realistic non-Douro port I've ever had.
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3094
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by Andy Velebil »

Moderators. the word Bas-tar-do (without the hyphens) automatically gets converted to "bar steward". Can you please fix this as it's the name of a grape grown in the Douro and should not be automatically fixed.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by djewesbury »

Andy Velebil wrote:Moderators. the word Bas-tar-do (without the hyphens) automatically gets converted to "bar steward". Can you please fix this as it's the name of a grape grown in the Douro and should not be automatically fixed.
:lol: This is indeed a problem! Your list of the ingredients of the Roxo Porto Ruby Tradicional suddenly verges into the surreal.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3094
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by Andy Velebil »

DRT wrote: Some USA producers still insist on using the name "Port" but the practice seems to be becoming less culturally acceptable, particularly as some of those same producers campaign to protect the names of American areas of origin or styles.
In the USA a new product cannot use the term "Port." However, older products were 'grandfathered' in and can still keep their previous use of the term "port."
CaliforniaBrad
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 232
Joined: 00:11 Thu 04 Jul 2013

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by CaliforniaBrad »

I have found a few California producers to create good Port-like-substances, with both traditional varieties and not. While you wouldn't usually confuse any of them for the real thing, they can certainly reach the status of delicious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by jdaw1 »

Andy Velebil wrote:Moderators. the word Bas-tar-do (without the hyphens) automatically gets converted to "bar steward". Can you please fix this as it's the name of a grape grown in the Douro and should not be automatically fixed.
Fixed.
User avatar
WineLoverPT
Warre’s Warrior
Posts: 86
Joined: 07:42 Sat 05 Apr 2014
Location: Portalegre and Lisbon, Portugal

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by WineLoverPT »

As the poser of the question, this has been most enlightening.
If I ever run across any of these "port-a-likes", at a decent price, I'll give them a go.

One thing that still puzzles me though is why it should be that these wines are, it seems, so far below the standard of pukka port?
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by djewesbury »

Perhaps because the quality of Port is so much about the long history of growing particular grapes in a certain range of terrains and climates, and then producing it in a certain way according to processes refined over centuries. Other regions produce wonderful dessert wines. Perhaps 'port' really does need the conditions in the Douro to be port.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3563
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by uncle tom »

Perhaps because the quality of Port is so much about the long history of growing particular grapes in a certain range of terrains and climates, and then producing it in a certain way according to processes refined over centuries. Other regions produce wonderful dessert wines. Perhaps 'port' really does need the conditions in the Douro to be port.
The schistous soil of the Douro provides a very distinctive minerality. However, you don't really appreciate this until you compare Douro white table wines with those made elsewhere.

Even the most determined efforts to replicate the port manufacturing process elsewhere in the world results in wines that are not quite right as port. I suspect it is the background minerality that the other wines lack that makes the difference.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

djewesbury wrote:Perhaps because the quality of Port is so much about the long history of growing particular grapes in a certain range of terrains and climates, and then producing it in a certain way according to processes refined over centuries. Other regions produce wonderful dessert wines. Perhaps 'port' really does need the conditions in the Douro to be port.
This is about what I think. I have had very good dessert wines (which port isn't IMHO) but I have always been thrown by descriptions which suggest they are like port, because when I bring them near to me and drink them, the look, smell and taste are all wrong. They should call them something else (as I believe is now the case) to save me from the gustatory curve ball they inflict.
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3094
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by Andy Velebil »

uncle tom wrote:
The schistous soil of the Douro provides a very distinctive minerality. However, you don't really appreciate this until you compare Douro white table wines with those made elsewhere.

Even the most determined efforts to replicate the port manufacturing process elsewhere in the world results in wines that are not quite right as port. I suspect it is the background minerality that the other wines lack that makes the difference.
I would agree with this. And the lack of irrigation in the Douro as well.
CaliforniaBrad
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 232
Joined: 00:11 Thu 04 Jul 2013

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by CaliforniaBrad »

Andy Velebil wrote:
uncle tom wrote:
The schistous soil of the Douro provides a very distinctive minerality. However, you don't really appreciate this until you compare Douro white table wines with those made elsewhere.

Even the most determined efforts to replicate the port manufacturing process elsewhere in the world results in wines that are not quite right as port. I suspect it is the background minerality that the other wines lack that makes the difference.
I would agree with this. And the lack of irrigation in the Douro as well.
I think an equally big issue with many of these other wines is they aren't made like Port. Many wineries will do things like ferment dry and back sweeten, not use anything like lagares (automatic or foot trodden), use old barriques and not larger barrels, not have a clue how to blend for a quality product as it's usually only part of a portfolio, etc. IMHO, all of those have as much as an effect as the terroir.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 19:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by AW77 »

LGTrotter wrote:I have had very good dessert wines (which port isn't IMHO)
Why is port not a good dessert wine in your opinion?
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

AW77 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I have had very good dessert wines (which port isn't IMHO)
Why is port not a good dessert wine in your opinion?
This was a bit of a "springes to catch woodcock" comment.

But I do not think that port goes well with any dessert, I refer here to mature vintage. I know there is a line of argument which suggests chocolate puddings but I reject this roundly. It does not seem to compliment rather they compete with each other and the chocolate usually wins. It comes back to my sense that port belongs at the end of a meal, perhaps with a scrap of cheese or a nut but not food and certainly not a dessert course. I remember a previous thread where it was suggested that the cheese belongs before the dessert with the port, this is a dangerous wind that blows in from France I fancy. And they drink port mainly as an aperitif!

I am aware that there are those that favour port with their red meat, but this seems rather heady a brew for the digestion to my way of thinking.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:I am aware that there are those that favour port with their red meat, but this seems rather heady a brew for the digestion to my way of thinking.
No headier than perfection.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I am aware that there are those that favour port with their red meat, but this seems rather heady a brew for the digestion to my way of thinking.
No headier than perfection.
For a life coach you seem to be straying from the middle way. Your disciples look to you for leadership. :wink:
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:For a life coach you seem to be straying from the middle way. Your disciples look to you for leadership. :wink:
No. They look to me for cold hard truth.

At least, if they look to me for self-restraint, they are fools.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:For a life coach you seem to be straying from the middle way. Your disciples look to you for leadership. :wink:
No. They look to me for cold hard truth.
Ruthless honesty is the primary skill of this particular Life Coach.

Well used coaching tips include:
  • "All of your problems begin and end with your pie-hole."
  • "Whatever you do, don't have half a hearty or half a stroke. Have a whole one."
  • "I'm an overweight, insulin dependant diabetic who drinks Port and eats clotted cream and you've got much more chance of dying soon than I have."
  • "Your arteries are so clogged you're about to die."
There are more ruthless gems that cannot be printed on a family-friendly website.

As a testament to the effectiveness of the above style of coaching there is now 17lbs less of DRT and I have had virtually no carbs or alcohol for the past three weeks. I have also eaten at least 5 salads, one of which I made myself.

Only 3st more to go and he might stop shouting at me.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by djewesbury »

Yes but will we recognise this new gaunt DRT..?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re:

Post by DRT »

djewesbury wrote:Yes but will we recognise this new gaunt DRT..?
Probably...
new-DRT.jpg
new-DRT.jpg (74.73 KiB) Viewed 4252 times
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
CaliforniaBrad
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 232
Joined: 00:11 Thu 04 Jul 2013

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by CaliforniaBrad »

DRT wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Yes but will we recognise this new gaunt DRT..?
Probably...
new-DRT.jpg
That picture is DRT-like, but not technically DRT


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24920
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by jdaw1 »

Compare and contrast, DRT as of a week ago.
Image
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by DRT »

Thanks for saving me some embarrassment by cropping low enough so that viewers cannot see the pork pie hanging out of my mouth.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by DRT »

Does anyone else think we might have drifted slightly off-topic?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: "Port-like" but not technically port?

Post by LGTrotter »

Not at all! This is an education for us, true it is the kind of knowledge which will be seared into our now scarred minds for ever, nonetheless...

So let me get us back on topic; port's quite nice really, innit.
Post Reply