Page 1 of 1

1994 Martinez

Posted: 08:53 Wed 27 Mar 2024
by jdaw1

Re: 1994 Martinez

Posted: 21:09 Wed 27 Mar 2024
by jdaw1
jdaw1 wrote: 01:18 Tue 26 Mar 2024
Alex Bridgeman wrote: 20:17 Mon 25 Mar 2024I just hate 1990s corks. Bloody Fonseca cork exploded into tiny fragments, even after being loosened with the JDAW cork impeller.
Ditto my Warre cork, but Martinez and Noval came clean. All three opened 23:30.


Edit: N, W, Mz — all decanted 07:45.
Mz94, opened 23:30 the night before, decanted 07:45: dark dark red, 80% opaque. Mid-weight, big maraschino cherries, and a crisp bitterness throughout. Liked. Good of itself, and adjusted for modern reputation of house, very good.

Re: 1994 Martinez

Posted: 11:17 Mon 08 Apr 2024
by nac
Quite pale - <50%. Something not quite right on the nose. Palate was better. Tastes much older than it is - maybe stored too hot at some point. OK. 4/7

Re: 1994 Martinez

Posted: 18:23 Tue 28 May 2024
by Alex Bridgeman
Opened 23.30, double decanted 07.45, tasted 17.50.

Paler than most of the wines at this tasting at 70% opacity, but attractive appearance nevertheless. Bright and fresh on an extremely attractive nose. Gentle and fragrant strawberry on the palate, beautifully framed with gentle tannins and elegant acidity. Sparkling (figuratively rather than literally) but slightly sweet aftertaste. Long and slightly sticky redcurrant aftertaste and a decent length on the finish. Delightfully attractive. 92/100.