1992 Fonseca

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14906
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

1992 Fonseca

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Fonseca 1992, from the wine list of the Hotel du Vin in Stratford for £125 (they also had Noval 2003 for £95 and Graham 10YO, 20YO and 30YO). Decanted about 2 hours. A wonderful mature dark red with an element of brick to the tone; 90% opaque. A wonderful nose of mature fruit, complex with spices, dried red fruit and aniseed. An explosion of flavour on the palate, dominated by mature fruit yet with a powerful acidity arrowing through the palate. The fruit is immense, bitter sweet, ripe cranberry with layer after layer of spice and some lovely, ripe fine-grained tannins. Fabulous complex palate. The aftertaste is intense, full and cranberry and aniseed. Long finish, full and dense. Fabulous Port, showing a little maturity and starting to develop some secondary spices. Superb Port, still with decades of life in the cellar. 94/100. Consumed 30-Jul-22.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Christopher
Niepoort LBV
Posts: 287
Joined: 14:24 Thu 17 Jan 2008
Location: London

Re: 1992 Fonseca

Post by Christopher »

A port to add to the cellar for sure. Particularly when better priced than the Taylor
Mike J. W.
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 161
Joined: 17:41 Sun 31 Jan 2021
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: 1992 Fonseca

Post by Mike J. W. »

Christopher wrote: 00:33 Fri 30 Dec 2022 A port to add to the cellar for sure. Particularly when better priced than the Taylor
The '92 Taylor's is a spectacular Port. I like it better than the '94, but you're right, the price is disproportionately higher than the '92 Fonseca.
Post Reply