1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
It is with great regret that I am no longer in a position to attend as that is Cheltenham week and I will be otherwise engaged (and since it is the same week every year you would have thought that I would have remembered that). Tighten those bootlaces and take to the field Harry!
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ Justin K - I am sorry you will not be with us
@ HTWH - you're in!
@ HTWH - you're in!
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ Alex Bridgeman - please could you bring the Warre?
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].
In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
I am afraid I will no longer be able to attend, apologies. Rich… enjoy!
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
If you want to reduce the number of bottles you're supplying I have plenty of the Churchill. Lots of the Noval. The Fonseca is a recent-ish release from Oporto. Hooper and Royal Oporto are individual bottles, but can't imagine we'll want those anyway. Will provide whatever you need.winesecretary wrote: ↑15:28 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].
In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
-
- Taylor’s LBV
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 16:40 Sat 23 Jun 2018
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Please could I adopt, George?winesecretary wrote: ↑15:28 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].
In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ M.Charlton - yes, adopting is encouraged here. I am arbitrarily assigning you the Gould Campbell (at an equally arbitrary price of £45)
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ nac - I am happy to be putting several wines into this - I suspect most will end up being adopted. Please could you bring the Noval?
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ Doggett - I am sorry you will not be able to be with us... but work calls I assume. Such is life...
@ rich_n - you're in!
@ rich_n - you're in!
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Listen. Listen!
An ᴏᴡᴄ of Mz85 is calling to me. If Martinez is a chosen shipper, one of those could be adopted.
An ᴏᴡᴄ of Mz85 is calling to me. If Martinez is a chosen shipper, one of those could be adopted.
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Currently, Charles is bringing the Martinez. But, I think you should open your case anyway. I had it less than two years back, and it was delicious, and fully ready (albeit I went out and bought a few more bottles immediately). One wouldn't want to let it go over. That would be a shame.
-
- Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
- Posts: 542
- Joined: 21:42 Tue 13 Nov 2018
- Location: Three Bridges
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Moving has been tricky for my local port stocks. May I adopt from a kind soul?
-
- Taylor’s LBV
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 16:40 Sat 23 Jun 2018
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
That’s very kind indeed - thank you.winesecretary wrote: ↑22:05 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ M.Charlton - yes, adopting is encouraged here. I am arbitrarily assigning you the Gould Campbell (at an equally arbitrary price of £45)
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ akzy - of course. Rebello Valente, at an equally arbitrary £45.
-
- Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
- Posts: 542
- Joined: 21:42 Tue 13 Nov 2018
- Location: Three Bridges
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Thank you George.winesecretary wrote: ↑09:11 Wed 16 Feb 2022 @ akzy - of course. Rebello Valente, at an equally arbitrary £45.
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Done.winesecretary wrote: ↑22:09 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ nac - I am happy to be putting several wines into this - I suspect most will end up being adopted. Please could you bring the Noval?
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Wonderful! I have the Dow and while that seems a popular option I would rather bring a bottle than adopt if possible.winesecretary wrote:@ Doggett - I am sorry you will not be able to be with us... but work calls I assume. Such is life...
@ rich_n - you're in!
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ rich_n - Dow it is, thank you
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Excellent, thanks.winesecretary wrote:@ rich_n - Dow it is, thank you
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.
@ Will W. , Screagle - feel free to bring a second (different) bottle of port for group adoption.
@ Will W. , Screagle - feel free to bring a second (different) bottle of port for group adoption.
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
I don't recall that many bad bottles at our 1985 horizontal in 2015... one (Hoopers) was very badly corked, and perhaps my overall perception of the event is skewed by that one particular bottle seeming completely out of place, but my memory says there was only the one bad bottle out of ~35. Just a lot of very average Port punctuated by a handful of exceptional bottles.winesecretary wrote: ↑20:28 Sat 19 Feb 2022 Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.
May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones!
Glenn Elliott
-
- Taylor’s LBV
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 17:41 Sun 31 Jan 2021
- Location: New Jersey, USA
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Glenn E. wrote: ↑01:09 Mon 21 Feb 2022I don't recall that many bad bottles at our 1985 horizontal in 2015... one (Hoopers) was very badly corked, and perhaps my overall perception of the event is skewed by that one particular bottle seeming completely out of place, but my memory says there was only the one bad bottle out of ~35. Just a lot of very average Port punctuated by a handful of exceptional bottles.winesecretary wrote: ↑20:28 Sat 19 Feb 2022 Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.
May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones!
35? Was that over 2 days?
-
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
@ Glenn E. - "May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones" is pretty much a perfect benediction for life in general.
Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022
Yes, of course, it would take too long to do 35 in one sitting. Best to break up the decanting and pouring over 2 days!
I'm also not sure that we collectively had sufficient glassware at that time for 35 bottles x 14-ish tasters for a single sitting. We do now, but at that time I think we may have only had about 8 cases of glasses (36 glasses per case). I think we now have about 18 total cases amongst the Sammamish Port Club.
Glenn Elliott