1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Organise events to meet up and drink Port.
Justin K
Niepoort LBV
Posts: 255
Joined: 19:19 Mon 15 Dec 2008

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by Justin K »

It is with great regret that I am no longer in a position to attend as that is Cheltenham week and I will be otherwise engaged (and since it is the same week every year you would have thought that I would have remembered that). Tighten those bootlaces and take to the field Harry!
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ Justin K - I am sorry you will not be with us
@ HTWH - you're in!
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ Alex Bridgeman - please could you bring the Warre?
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].

In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
User avatar
Doggett
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1188
Joined: 17:40 Sun 20 Sep 2015
Location: Weymouth
Contact:

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by Doggett »

I am afraid I will no longer be able to attend, apologies. Rich… enjoy!
User avatar
nac
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1836
Joined: 14:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by nac »

winesecretary wrote: 15:28 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].

In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
If you want to reduce the number of bottles you're supplying I have plenty of the Churchill. Lots of the Noval. The Fonseca is a recent-ish release from Oporto. Hooper and Royal Oporto are individual bottles, but can't imagine we'll want those anyway. Will provide whatever you need.
M.Charlton
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 191
Joined: 16:40 Sat 23 Jun 2018

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by M.Charlton »

winesecretary wrote: 15:28 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ all (except Alex B, jdaw1, CPR1) While we would welcome 15 ports I do not thing we want to go to 18. Please could you let me know, by PM if preferred, what you have that can fill the gaps or whether you would like to adopt one of the ones I have on hand [or whether you would like to bring one of those yourself rather than adopting].

In terms of those wines I suspect we would most likely enjoy drinking that are not already listed in bold as going to be present, they are presented in roughly declining order of preference.
Please could I adopt, George?
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ M.Charlton - yes, adopting is encouraged here. I am arbitrarily assigning you the Gould Campbell (at an equally arbitrary price of £45)
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ nac - I am happy to be putting several wines into this - I suspect most will end up being adopted. Please could you bring the Noval?
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ Doggett - I am sorry you will not be able to be with us... but work calls I assume. Such is life...

@ rich_n - you're in!
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by jdaw1 »

Listen. Listen!

An ᴏᴡᴄ of Mz85 is calling to me. If Martinez is a chosen shipper, one of those could be adopted.
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

Currently, Charles is bringing the Martinez. But, I think you should open your case anyway. I had it less than two years back, and it was delicious, and fully ready (albeit I went out and bought a few more bottles immediately). One wouldn't want to let it go over. That would be a shame.
akzy
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 542
Joined: 21:42 Tue 13 Nov 2018
Location: Three Bridges

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by akzy »

Moving has been tricky for my local port stocks. May I adopt from a kind soul?
M.Charlton
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 191
Joined: 16:40 Sat 23 Jun 2018

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by M.Charlton »

winesecretary wrote: 22:05 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ M.Charlton - yes, adopting is encouraged here. I am arbitrarily assigning you the Gould Campbell (at an equally arbitrary price of £45)
That’s very kind indeed - thank you.
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ akzy - of course. Rebello Valente, at an equally arbitrary £45.
akzy
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 542
Joined: 21:42 Tue 13 Nov 2018
Location: Three Bridges

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by akzy »

winesecretary wrote: 09:11 Wed 16 Feb 2022 @ akzy - of course. Rebello Valente, at an equally arbitrary £45.
Thank you George.
User avatar
nac
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1836
Joined: 14:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by nac »

winesecretary wrote: 22:09 Tue 15 Feb 2022 @ nac - I am happy to be putting several wines into this - I suspect most will end up being adopted. Please could you bring the Noval?
Done.
User avatar
rich_n
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 550
Joined: 10:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by rich_n »

winesecretary wrote:@ Doggett - I am sorry you will not be able to be with us... but work calls I assume. Such is life...

@ rich_n - you're in!
Wonderful! I have the Dow and while that seems a popular option I would rather bring a bottle than adopt if possible.
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ rich_n - Dow it is, thank you
User avatar
rich_n
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 550
Joined: 10:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by rich_n »

winesecretary wrote:@ rich_n - Dow it is, thank you
Excellent, thanks.
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.

@ Will W. , Screagle - feel free to bring a second (different) bottle of port for group adoption.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4188
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by Glenn E. »

winesecretary wrote: 20:28 Sat 19 Feb 2022 Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.
I don't recall that many bad bottles at our 1985 horizontal in 2015... one (Hoopers) was very badly corked, and perhaps my overall perception of the event is skewed by that one particular bottle seeming completely out of place, but my memory says there was only the one bad bottle out of ~35. Just a lot of very average Port punctuated by a handful of exceptional bottles.

May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones!
Glenn Elliott
Mike J. W.
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 161
Joined: 17:41 Sun 31 Jan 2021
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by Mike J. W. »

Glenn E. wrote: 01:09 Mon 21 Feb 2022
winesecretary wrote: 20:28 Sat 19 Feb 2022 Over dinner on 16th February I was warned by those in the know that 1985 was 'dirty' vintage and so we should expect rather higher than usual failure rates. Accordingly I am going to suggest we go for sharing 18 different ports and hoping that 14 or 15 of them will be good.
I don't recall that many bad bottles at our 1985 horizontal in 2015... one (Hoopers) was very badly corked, and perhaps my overall perception of the event is skewed by that one particular bottle seeming completely out of place, but my memory says there was only the one bad bottle out of ~35. Just a lot of very average Port punctuated by a handful of exceptional bottles.

May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones!

35? :shock: Was that over 2 days?
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by winesecretary »

@ Glenn E. - "May your tasting include all of the exceptional bottles, and no bad ones" is pretty much a perfect benediction for life in general.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4188
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1985 Horizontal - 16 March 2022

Post by Glenn E. »

Mike J. W. wrote: 02:29 Mon 21 Feb 2022 35? :shock: Was that over 2 days?
Yes, of course, it would take too long to do 35 in one sitting. Best to break up the decanting and pouring over 2 days!

I'm also not sure that we collectively had sufficient glassware at that time for 35 bottles x 14-ish tasters for a single sitting. We do now, but at that time I think we may have only had about 8 cases of glasses (36 glasses per case). I think we now have about 18 total cases amongst the Sammamish Port Club.
Glenn Elliott
Post Reply