Time for a TN sort?
Time for an update.
Time for an update. If I may now do this myself, please tell me how. If I can’t, somebody who can please cope.
Pls wait until tomorrow, as some TN will be entered today
Pls wait until tomorrow, as some TN will be entered later today.
Ready when you are.
They’re done. Ready when you are.jdaw1 wrote:Pls wait until tomorrow, as some TN will be entered later today.
- RonnieRoots
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: 07:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: Middle Earth
Doing both works for me.
Doing both works for me.
Tasting Note index update
Croft offline writeups delayed by request of RAH. Several other tastings have gone in though, so an update would be a good idea. Please send.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
You may need to do some tidying of Tasting Note titles first. I noted recently that Simon and Axel have posted with abbreviated years or shipper followed by year rather than the "standard" that we are trying to follow.
Alex
Alex
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
- KillerB
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 21:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Sky Blue City, England
Already done and downloaded.AHB wrote:You may need to do some tidying of Tasting Note titles first. I noted recently that Simon and Axel have posted with abbreviated years or shipper followed by year rather than the "standard" that we are trying to follow.
Alex
There are also a couple of senior members, one of whom is an AR pedantic administrator, who do not write "VP" nor "Vintage Port", assuming that we know it is not LBV nor Colheita. I will not name names.
Questions
Offley Boa Vista LBV, or Offley LBV?
Also, there was a little confusion about which bottle of G70 was this, resulting in delayed creation of this TN which ought to go in this batch. All you need tell me is the UNIX time — I have everything else.
Does Sandeman Imperial usually have an age indication? Did this have one?
Offley Boa Vista LBV, or Offley LBV?
Also, there was a little confusion about which bottle of G70 was this, resulting in delayed creation of this TN which ought to go in this batch. All you need tell me is the UNIX time — I have everything else.
Does Sandeman Imperial usually have an age indication? Did this have one?
What we’ve drunk at least ten times
What we’ve drunk at least ten times:
- 47 Ã Graham’s;
- 44 Ã Quinta do Vesuvio;
- 31 Ã Fonseca;
- 25 Ã Taylor;
- 25 Ã Warre;
- 22 Ã Nacional;
- 20 Ã Dow;
- 18 Ã Croft;
- 18 Ã Noval;
- 16 Ã Cockburn;
- 13 Ã Niepoort;
- 13 Ã Sandeman;
- 11 Ã Harvey’s (Martinez);
- 11 Ã Noval colheita;
- 11 Ã Taylor Quinta de Vargellas.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Fixed: Berry Brothers & Rudd Selection.
Fixed: Berry Brothers & Rudd Selection.
No. It is a premium ruby so should have NV in front.jdaw1 wrote: Does Sandeman Imperial usually have an age indication? Did this have one?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
I also improved the links on the front page.
I also improved the links on the front page.
- RonnieRoots
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: 07:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: Middle Earth
Julian,
When browsing the TN index I noticed that Quinta do Passadouro is listed as "Niepoort Quinta ...".
The ties with Niepoort have been broken since 2004, and the 2005 vintage port (which is the only one in the index) is produced and bottled as an independant single quinta product.
Can you change this in the index?
When browsing the TN index I noticed that Quinta do Passadouro is listed as "Niepoort Quinta ...".
The ties with Niepoort have been broken since 2004, and the 2005 vintage port (which is the only one in the index) is produced and bottled as an independant single quinta product.
Can you change this in the index?
The conversation about Jacob's TN Searchy Thingy that followed the above post has now been moved to here.
So, back on topic, can we please have a TN sort?
Thanks
Derek
So, back on topic, can we please have a TN sort?
Thanks
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
TN sort
Chief admin: please send the data on Friday.
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Index updated today thanks to ARK for sending data. Cockburn (start here) is looking impressively complete.
Re: Time for a TN sort?
I think the time is once again upon us.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Time for me to take a look and make sure I've posted all my recent notes!
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Congratulations to AHB: that was the twenty-thousandth post on
.

Re: Time for a TN sort?
Done. Due to diligent drinking and note-taking by members of
each of the two TN indexes (alphabetical, date) has grown to four posts.

Re: Time for a TN sort?
Careful perusal has found some problems.
- Is Adams the same as Adam?
- 1995 Petre's Port vintage port? Allegedly by Niepoort, but not obviously mentioned on niepoort-vinhos.com.
I’m going to call it ‟Petre’s” with no vintner’s website, unless somebody has a better plan.
Re: Time for a TN sort?
And Vesuvio leads with 68 TNs, of which 24 are from Mr V. himself.
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Yes.jdaw1 wrote:
- Is Adams the same as Adam?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
- RonnieRoots
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: 07:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: Middle Earth
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Petre's was a second label by Niepoort that they sometimes produced (mostly on request I guess) but never actively marketed. I don't think the label is used anymore, as they now have "Secundum".jdaw1 wrote:Careful perusal has found some problems.
- 1995 Petre's Port vintage port? Allegedly by Niepoort, but not obviously mentioned on niepoort-vinhos.com.I’m going to call it ‟Petre’s” with no vintner’s website, unless somebody has a better plan.
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Should they be merged? ‟Secundum (Petre’s)”?
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Personally, I would not merge these ports, but keep them separate. From what I have learnt, Petre was an experiment over a handful of vintages by Dirk to see if he could make a decent but low cost house vintage port for the restaurant trade - effectively a competitor to the Buyer's Own Brands. Secundum is different. It is a Niepoort Port which carries the Niepoort name and is blended to be in the Niepoort house style, even if more approachable when young.
My vote is to keep them separate anbd to show Petre's Port as just that.
My vote is to keep them separate anbd to show Petre's Port as just that.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Re: Time for a TN sort?
As ‟Petre’s Port” or as ‟Niepoort (Petre’s)”? I think the latter more useful, but will defer to instruction.AHB wrote:My vote is to keep them separate anbd to show Petre's Port as just that.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Time for a TN sort?
I would suggest as "Petre's Port (Niepoort)" if we want to link the two together. The reason for suggesting this is that nowhere on the label is there a reference to the fact that this port comes from the Niepoort stable. Anyone finding a bottle and wanting to look it up will be searching the internet purely on the string "Petre's Port".
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Re: Time for a TN sort?
The sort order is separate from the name, but it looks more natural if the visual is close to the logical. Would ‟Niepoort: Petre’s Port” work perhaps with different punctuation? And you wouldn’t have to type this: just ‟Petre” would identify it to my software.
- RonnieRoots
- Fonseca 1980
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: 07:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: Middle Earth
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Secundum and Petre's are indeed two different types of port. Sorry if that wasn't clear from my previous post.
Alex' suggestion of Petre's Port (Niepoort) sounds most logical to me, but it really doesn't matter that much to me as long as the link with Niepoort is clearly shown.
Alex' suggestion of Petre's Port (Niepoort) sounds most logical to me, but it really doesn't matter that much to me as long as the link with Niepoort is clearly shown.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Time for a TN sort?
I'm sure I could live with something along the lines of Niepoort - Petre's Port (or the punctuation that you believe is appropriate). I'm happy for you to try it and for us to see what it looks like in the next sort. Incidentally, there have been a lot of new tasting notes added recently - is it time for another update?
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Re: Time for a TN sort?
I can’t do my part of the update until 26th December. Perhaps Chief Admin would do his part at the last convenient moment before Boxing Day afternoon?
Re: Time for a TN sort?
TN index re-made.
We lacks TNs from: ’93; ’81; ’73; ’69; only a colheita for ’61; ’59; ’56; ’54; ’51; ’49; ’46; ’43; ’39; ’36; ’28 to ’30, and too many earlier years. There are even whole decades where we have failed (e.g., the 1880s and 1840s).
We lacks TNs from: ’93; ’81; ’73; ’69; only a colheita for ’61; ’59; ’56; ’54; ’51; ’49; ’46; ’43; ’39; ’36; ’28 to ’30, and too many earlier years. There are even whole decades where we have failed (e.g., the 1880s and 1840s).
Re: Time for a TN sort?
I plan to open a Quinta das Licieras 1993 on 28th September 2011 so will plug that gap then, unless Tom opens his bottle firstjdaw1 wrote:We lacks TNs from: ’93...

Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Your son's 18th birthday perhaps?!DRT wrote:I plan to open a Quinta das Licieras 1993 on 28th September 2011 so will plug that gap then, unless Tom opens his bottle firstjdaw1 wrote:We lacks TNs from: ’93...![]()
Derek
Ben
-------
Vintage 1970 and now proud owner of my first ever 'half-century'!
-------
Vintage 1970 and now proud owner of my first ever 'half-century'!
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Correctbenread wrote:Your son's 18th birthday perhaps?!DRT wrote:I plan to open a Quinta das Licieras 1993 on 28th September 2011 so will plug that gap then, unless Tom opens his bottle firstjdaw1 wrote:We lacks TNs from: ’93...![]()
Derek

"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Something horrid has happened to the Smith Woodhouse vintage port entries in the Alphabetical TN Index
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Ooops. Will fix later today.
Perhaps chief admin would update my data?
Perhaps chief admin would update my data?
Re: Time for a TN sort?
Chief admin updated data, and I have updated the indexes (alphabetical, date).
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Time for a TN sort?
There is one port which is titled "Niepoort vintage port vintage port LBV
2004: MM on 14 Oct 2008"
2004: MM on 14 Oct 2008"
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!