Posts per page

Make suggestions and report problems.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Posts per page

Post by jdaw1 »

The setting ‘Posts per page’ has been 25 since 2007. Bandwidth is now much cheaper; device memory more abundant: this number has been increased to 50.

If you strongly object, please give reasoning here.

(Note to self: General > Post settings > Posts per page)
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4455
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Posts per page

Post by flash_uk »

Good move 👍
MigSU
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 773
Joined: 12:22 Wed 17 Feb 2021
Location: Douro Valley

Re: Posts per page

Post by MigSU »

Sounds good.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Posts per page

Post by jdaw1 »

Previous discussion of this is at Turn page at 50, not 15:
jdaw1 wrote: 15:59 Thu 21 Jun 2007The phpBB default is that a thread turn the page at 15 posts. Please could that parameter be changed to 50. Fifteen so breaks the continuity of a conversation.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Posts per page

Post by jdaw1 »

Would 100 be a better value?

Or do we need to get there in baby steps?
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4455
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Posts per page

Post by flash_uk »

jdaw1 wrote: 17:08 Sun 09 Feb 2025 Would 100 be a better value?

Or do we need to get there in baby steps?
I'd stick with 50 for a while and see how it goes. Posts per page is mostly relevant for organisation threads which can reach 200+ posts at a time. And usually it is the organiser that is scrolling back and forward trying to find something or other. I suspect with 100pp it could become easy to get "lost".
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3659
Joined: 13:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Posts per page

Post by PhilW »

I agree that 15 is shorter than ideal, so an increase makes sense. Am not sure that hugely long pages are especially ideal either, since navigation can become a pain; personally 35-40 seems about right intuitively while looking at some previous long discussions; so 50 seems like enough to me; however that might just be familiarity speaking.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Posts per page

Post by jdaw1 »

PhilW wrote: 07:27 Mon 10 Feb 2025I agree that 15 is shorter than ideal
It was 15 for only a few weeks 17½ years ago. Then it became 25.
Post Reply