Port brand abbreviations

[flash_uk]

Pl. Pm easily confused with Pn.

I was going to say Pm, as Pl is easily confused with Pi

[jdaw1]

Palmer? Pl or Pm?

I’m neutral between them. Is anybody willing to break the tie?

[M.Charlton]

Palmer? Pl or Pm?

I’m neutral between them. Is anybody willing to break the tie?

FTW, Pm.

[winesecretary]

I concede gracefully - Pm it is.

[PhilW]

Pl. Pm easily confused with Pn.

I was going to say Pm, as Pl is easily confused with Pi

In agreement with Mike.

[jdaw1]

Pm it is: done.

[Glenn E.]

Pm it is: done.

Late to the party, but either worked for me.

[Alex Bridgeman]

Pm it is: done.

But have they made more than three vintages?

Wine Searcher suggests they have only made 2015 and 2017. I haven’t looked through our vintage lists, but the question remains unanswered.

[jdaw1]

But have they made more than three vintages?

unless we wish to extend to colheitas now.

That is a fair question. We do seem to have strayed into colheita-land, so much that signposts would probably be welcome.

[Glenn E.]

unless we wish to extend to colheitas now.

That is a fair question. We do seem to have strayed into colheita-land, so much that signposts would probably be welcome.

That begs the question, what is the purpose of the brand abbreviations?

I dare guess that most tastings in the UK are VP-related. In that case, no abbreviations for Colheitas are really necessary. Especially when one also considers that most Colheita producers also produce VP and likely already have an abbreviation.

But if the purpose is to be able to reliably identify producers (most often on a tasting placemat, but also elsewhere), then we should have abbreviations for producers of Colheitas as well.

But... that creates a further question. How does one distinguish between a VP and a Colheita from the same producer and the same year? Or should that be left to context (in a forum post) or AboveTitles / BelowTitles on a placemat?

[Alex Bridgeman]

I always use a lower case “c” after the shipper / year abbreviation to denote a colheita.

Thus N03 and N03c would represent Quinta do Noval 2003 Vintage Port and Quinta do Noval 2003 Colheita Port.

This has the simplicity of being brief but easy to understand.

[jdaw1]

In any year a producer might make a VP, a colheita, an LBV, a crusted, perhaps even a white. Surely their purpose is to give a role and meaning to the placemat software’s Abovetitles, Belowtitles, and Overtitles.

[jdaw1]

Vista Alegre and its possible abbreviation VA were discussed above, without a conclusion being definitely reached. (Also, cross link to Justin K in the Latest buy thread.)

Though VA is obvious, it is, as MigSU correctly wrote, “an unfortunate abbreviation”. Perhaps we should go in a slightly different direction: could people accept Al or Ag? My preference, not strongly held, is for the first of these: Al. Please choose one of these two — or argue for something else.

Currently, the list has few A’s:

A = J. H. Andresen
Ad = Adam

[PhilW]

Still not VP, never mind 3+ vintages of VP, so for me no fixed abbreviation.

That said, if the consensus thinks otherwise, then I would very strongly favour use of VA over the suggested alternatives.

[jdaw1]

Still not VP, never mind 3+ vintages of VP, so for me no fixed abbreviation.

This page mentions Vista Alegre vintages 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2005, and 2000.


And while at it, this page mentions Quinta de Valle Longo, vintages 2018, 2017, and 2011. My preference is Lg, but Ln should be mentioned, even if only to be curtly dismissed. Other L’s:

Lc = Quinta das Liceiras
Lm = Quinta das Lamelas

[PhilW]

Still not VP, never mind 3+ vintages of VP, so for me no fixed abbreviation.

This page mentions Vista Alegre vintages 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2005, and 2000.

Fair. VA.

And while at it, this page mentions Quinta de Valle Longo, vintages 2018, 2017, and 2011. My preference is Lg, but Ln should be mentioned, even if only to be curtly dismissed. Other L’s:

Lc = Quinta das Liceiras
Lm = Quinta das Lamelas

I'd have gone for VL (despite Vl) or VLn, but not strongly felt.

[jdaw1]

I would very strongly favour use of VA over the suggested alternatives.

VA.

I'd have gone for VL (despite Vl) or VLn, but not strongly felt.

We disagree. There are ten V’s, and only two each for A’s and L’s. For my palate there’s better distinctiveness in favouring the rarely-used letters (Al, Lg).

Edit: further, words such as Vista and Valle are low-information widespread almost-generic words. Not to the same extent as ‘Quinta’, but heading in that direction. Hence should be dropped for the abbreviations, which should be anti-generic .

Self-evidently, we lack consensus. Perhaps others have strong opinions.

[Alex Bridgeman]

For Vista Alegre, I would prefer VAl. As an abbreviation, I think VAl (or V Al) is an intuitive abbreviation of Vista Alegre or of their brand name of Vallegre.

(I love that my Myers Briggs personality profile - INFP - is probably as far as it is possible to be opposite to JDAW's.)

For Valle Longo, VL is — for me — the obvious choice.

And, ahem, while words such as Boa, Vista, Vale, Valle, Bom, etc. are low value words, when combined with the other word in the title of the Quinta they are absolutely essential in the naming of the exact location. We're not trying to create an alternative to What 3 Words here!

[PhilW]

I'd be happy with VAl and VL respectively.

[Glenn E.]

That said, if the consensus thinks otherwise, then I would very strongly favour use of VA over the suggested alternatives.

I agree.

I prefer VA as it currently stands, but would accept VAl as an alternative. I am unconcerned with the association with volatile acidity.

VL and anything not starting with 'V' are just... wrong. The brand is not "Vista 'Legre" or "Alegre". If you put "Al" or "Lg" on a placemat, I wouldn't have the slightest idea what company you were talking about. Part of the duty of an abbreviation is that it be reasonably apparent what it abbreviates. "Al" and "Lg" fail that test.

[Glenn E.]

And while at it, this page mentions Quinta de Valle Longo, vintages 2018, 2017, and 2011. My preference is Lg, but Ln should be mentioned, even if only to be curtly dismissed. Other L’s:

Lc = Quinta das Liceiras
Lm = Quinta das Lamelas

I realized that I missed this earlier.

I think the best abbreviation here would be VL, though both VLn and VLg are suitable as well. Any of the 3 would be fine with me.

[jdaw1]

I would prefer VAl.

For Valle Longo, VL is — for me — the obvious choice.

I'd be happy with VAl and VL respectively.

would accept VAl as an alternative.

I think the best abbreviation here would be VL

I don’t love the consensus, but it’s acceptable.

Hence, unless there is strong cogent objection, soon, the decision is:
VAl = Vista Alegre
VL = Quinta de Valle Longo

[jdaw1]

(I love that my Myers Briggs personality profile - INFP - is probably as far as it is possible to be opposite to JDAW's.)

With only slight interest do I note your delight at being the opposite of me. Doubtless there is a personality type that would be upset, but not one that I have.

[flash_uk]

(I love that my Myers Briggs personality profile - INFP - is probably as far as it is possible to be opposite to JDAW's.)

With only slight interest do I note your delight at being the opposite of me. Doubtless there is a personality type that would be upset, but not one that I have.

Over time I have reached the conclusion that Myers Briggs and astrology are siblings.

[jdaw1]

VAl = Vista Alegre
VL = Quinta de Valle Longo

Done.