Pre-coronavirus-induced-mass discombobulation, I addressed the Montez Champalimaud family’s brief engagement as a port shipper; in particular, in the context of its 1989 vintage port (http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13280). Whereas the said pandemic is indisputably a serious threat to the aged, the infirm and front-line medical personnel, the repose forced upon the rest of us serves to encourage the exploration of the less-visited corners of our wine cellars. Whilst wading through the detritus of my own (i.e., anything produced by Borges after 1960), I stumbled across the bottle which constitutes the focus of this tasting note. I am happy to report that it was rather good.
Consumed on 04 April 2020 after a five-hour decant, which proved to be about right, the wine in the glass was almost entirely opaque, chestnut-brown in colour and topped by a clear rim. The nose was presented with the marked characteristics of youth: minerality and stewed red berries being the dominant features, with hints of prune, mint and perhaps even a touch of oak. At the mouth, a pleasing and not inconsiderable sweetness hit the fore-palate, dominated by notes of swollen black cherries and plums, with lesser touches of rose hip and blond honey. These sensations gave way at the mid-palate to gentle spices, with a generous helping of residual tannins becoming evident at the back. Each drink was somehow akin to washing down a mouthful sweet-and-sour sauce with strong black tea - an unusual combination, admittedly, though perfectly satisfying in this context. At the medium-long finish, the tannins gave way in a most agreeable manner to the freshness which had been evident at the nose.
The 1995 Champalimaud is not anywhere near as ubiquitous on the secondary market as the 1989 vintage produced by the same family. However, where it does make an appearance the 1995 tends to be priced similarly; that is, in the range of EUR 30-35 per bottle. The latter constitutes an agreeable tariff for this well-structured wine; and, whilst it remains a decade from its peak, the 1995 Champalimaud is approachable now. Indeed, this wine is capable already of holding its own against any 1995 vintage port, save that produced by Ramos Pintos and, most especially, Quinta de Vargellas.
-89 points
1995 Champalimaud
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 1995 Champalimaud
Was this vintage sealed by a screw-cap or cork?
Re: 1995 Champalimaud
Cork. To the best of my knowledge, Miguel Montez started to use screw-caps somewhere around the year 2000, and then only on still wines bottled under the Quinta do Cotto label. The last Champalimaud VP to be marketed, from the 2001 vintage (additional to the years 1982, 1989 and 1995), was sealed with a cork. (Or so I gather; I have none of the 2001 in my cellar though have just looked online at a handful of photographs.) Years ago, Roy Hersh posted a tasting note on FTLOP pointing to a 2005 VP, which he had tasted as a cask sample, though I have never seen any evidence that it was released. All of the aforementioned noted, other readers may have more accurate information than myself.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 1995 Champalimaud
Ok thanks. I recall having a Port from his company under screwcap way back around 2007/08-ish. Quite the controversy when he did so.
Re: 1995 Champalimaud
Meeting Mr. Montez is most certainly on my to-do list, which is to note that I shall ask him.Andy Velebil wrote: ↑04:00 Mon 06 Apr 2020 Ok thanks. I recall having a Port from his company under screwcap way back around 2007/08-ish. Quite the controversy when he did so.