Page 2 of 5

Re: 75@40

Posted: 14:12 Tue 22 Sep 2015
by Doggett
If there is room, I would like to come along for the 75@40 tasting in December at the wonderful Boot.
I would need to adopt a bottle for this tasting if there is room for another and someone could kindly help me with a bottle from the vintage? hope to see you there...

Re: 75@40

Posted: 14:20 Tue 22 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
SCD added to first post and to placemats.

As ownership of bottles is concentrated amongst only a few of us (several people having none), it likely that we’ll share costs rather than adopt individual bottles.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 05:56 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
Looking at the bottle line up there is a noticeable gap which seems rather elusive..

Does anyone have a Sandeman '75 in their cellar??

Re: 75@40

Posted: 08:51 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by Doggett
Hi Tom,

If no one has the S75 then I have seen them listed here. It is claimed they are shipped straight from the Sandeman cellars. I would be happy to purchase as my contribution if that would help? I am not sure what the opinion of this supplier is, so any thoughts appreciated.

http://www.vintagewineandport.co.uk/vin ... 1975-wine/

Re: 75@40

Posted: 09:41 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
£90 is over-priced for a 1975.

Have you tried wine-searcher.com?

Re: 75@40

Posted: 11:53 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by Doggett
jdaw1 wrote:
£90 is over-priced for a 1975.

Have you tried wine-searcher.com?
thanks for the tip, I have had a look and MWH has a much more reasonable listing of 11 bottles @ £55. will keep researching.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 07:38 Thu 24 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
I looked at wine-searcher initially and didn't see any Sa75, but now see MWH has some at a tolerable price - will contact..

Re: 75@40

Posted: 18:00 Fri 25 Sep 2015
by ProfS
jdaw1 wrote:We look forward to seeing you at this tasting.
Travel booked. See you all on 15th (if not before).

Re: 75@40

Posted: 10:58 Sat 26 Sep 2015
by Axel P
Hi Tom,

please put me on as well.

I would have additionally:

Dow from Magnum
Graham from Magnum
Messias
Quarles Harris

Axel

Re: 75@40

Posted: 21:43 Sun 27 Sep 2015
by forest26
Hi guys
Is there a spare berth at this one?
Let me know if so or one becomes available - I have a few from this year
Incidentally looking at the thread I can donate a mag of Sa 75
Best wishes
Tony

Re: 75@40

Posted: 01:06 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
On Tom’s behalf AP and TC added to first post.

Tom: you are being offered magnums. You need to shape this tasting.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 09:52 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by ProfS
jdaw1 wrote:On Tom’s behalf AP and TC added to first post.
Tom/jdaw would you be able to add me to the attendee list?

Re: 75@40

Posted: 11:10 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
ProfS wrote:Tom/jdaw would you be able to add me to the attendee list?
My fault—forgot. Now done, and I think in the correct order.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 06:00 Tue 29 Sep 2015
by WS1
jdaw1 wrote:On Tom’s behalf AP and TC added to first post.

Tom: you are being offered magnums. You need to shape this tasting.
Indeed! Apparantly though he is busy sourcing Ck1908 Magnums first....

:wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: 75@40

Posted: 17:41 Tue 29 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
I don't have any magnums of '75 but now they're popping up..

What do people think? Shall we go for mags wherever possible, so we all get several well filled glasses?

Re: 75@40

Posted: 06:41 Wed 30 Sep 2015
by DRT
There is a danger that mags will distort the result of this tasting. I thought the purpose was to determine whether or not 1975 VP has turned a corner and become worth buying. Mags are likely to have evolved in a different way to the standard bottles that are generally available. Do we still have the same objective or has this turned into something else?

Re: 75@40

Posted: 13:05 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by idj123
Personally, I'd be happy to taste a G75 or D75 Mg alongside the standard* format to ascertain the difference in evolution between the two and if we're after the inclusion of S75 and haven't got the standard* format then there seems no harm in including the S75 Mg.

*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!

Re: 75@40

Posted: 13:34 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by jdaw1
idj123 wrote:*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!
My standard 1975 is none at all, which we agree would be wrong at this tasting.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 16:00 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by WS1
jdaw1 wrote:
idj123 wrote:*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!
My standard 1975 is none at all, which we agree would be wrong at this tasting.
The most experiences of 1975 port I have is for Cockburns since I had a sixpack. The one I like most so far is Niepoort.

regards

WS1

Re: 75@40

Posted: 19:15 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by DRT
DRT wrote:There is a danger that mags will distort the result of this tasting. I thought the purpose was to determine whether or not 1975 VP has turned a corner and become worth buying. Mags are likely to have evolved in a different way to the standard bottles that are generally available. Do we still have the same objective or has this turned into something else?
Which idiot stole my login and posted this nonsense!!

The more mags the merrier I say!!

Re: 75@40

Posted: 14:01 Thu 08 Oct 2015
by flash_uk
I can supply a Dow '75.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 16:14 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by Axel P
I would like to see the Mags alongside with the regular wine as this would very much again show the difference and tell us how a normal bottle was some 10-15 years ago. My Mags were recently bought directly from the Symington cellar, so fairly good provenance.

@Tom: let me know when and where to send them or to bring them to the 85 horizontal

Axel

Re: 75@40

Posted: 22:17 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by uncle tom
Looking at the volume of port per capita, and not wanting wastage, I'm thinking that with the addition of a QH (bottle) and Sa (Mag) to my original list, the addition of one mag vs bottle comparison would bring us to saturation point, - or would people rather pig out..??

Re: 75@40

Posted: 23:30 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by DRT
uncle tom wrote:Looking at the volume of port per capita, and not wanting wastage, I'm thinking that with the addition of a QH (bottle) and Sa (Mag) to my original list, the addition of one mag vs bottle comparison would bring us to saturation point, - or would people rather pig out..??
It is 1975 - lots of it can be sent to the kitchen if not wanted.

Re: 75@40

Posted: 20:37 Sun 29 Nov 2015
by djewesbury
I am now uncertain as to whether I can attend. I will update soon but it is looking more unlikely than likely.