Even more utterly wrong.flash_uk wrote:Teetotal
The Xness was not known to me before the formalities.jdaw1 wrote:Immediately after the formalities were done
Even more utterly wrong.flash_uk wrote:Teetotal
The Xness was not known to me before the formalities.jdaw1 wrote:Immediately after the formalities were done
Not anything that could be construed as being of the same type as a religion. No.LGTrotter wrote:A humanist wedding?
Atheist?jdaw1 wrote:Not anything that could be construed as being of the same type as a religion. No.LGTrotter wrote:A humanist wedding?
flash_uk wrote:Royal
LGTrotter wrote:Atheist?
None of these.Glenn E. wrote:A double wedding?
Though it was the first open-air wedding that I had attended, some others might well have attended a wedding of this type. So no.LGTrotter wrote:Open air wedding?
Was it? Maybe. But not the answer?CaliforniaBrad wrote:First day of summer/solstice wedding?
You were all in swimwear, it was in a pool?jdaw1 wrote:It might help to focus on the officiating minister (who, separately, admitted to having been on rum+something for six hours), but not on his religion nor like status.
Everybody’s first? Really?Glenn E. wrote:Drunken wedding?
Nothing to do with attire or lack thereof. Focus on the officiating minister, not on me, not on the audience.LGTrotter wrote:You were all in swimwear, it was in a pool?
No, but closer. What was the thing in his hand, never before seen by me to be used for that purpose?CaliforniaBrad wrote:A minister missing a limb?
A term which suggests a pregnancy. This is unlikely in a ♂-♂ wedding.Glenn E. wrote:A shotgun wedding?
Yes. At weddings that I have previously attended the authority read from a book, or perhaps paper. Never before had I seen it done from an iPad. The Dog’s question.LGTrotter wrote:An iPad?
We live in strange and terrible times.jdaw1 wrote:Yes. At weddings that I have previously attended the authority read from a book, or perhaps paper. Never before had I seen it done from an iPad. The Dog’s question.LGTrotter wrote:An iPad?
Is this the response I have earned? To be a dog?jdaw1 wrote:The Dog’s question.
Is LGTrotter a dog? We await evidence to the contrary.LGTrotter wrote:Is this the response I have earned? To be a dog?jdaw1 wrote:The Dog’s question.
No, not this year.CaliforniaBrad wrote:A cuckoo?
No.PopulusTremula wrote:Nightingale