1966 Smith Woodhouse

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
Bertie3000
Cockburn’s Special Reserve
Posts: 42
Joined: 11:28 Sat 30 Oct 2021

Re: 1966 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Bertie3000 »

Smith Woodhouse 1966
Smith Woodhouse 1966
IMG_4971.jpeg (454.99 KiB) Viewed 3137 times
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14915
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1966 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Bottled in the UK by the Wine Society. Slightly browner in tone than the Gould Campbell tasted alongside it - a bronze tone rather than a rose-red; 30% opaque. A little subdued on the nose, a little cranberry - slightly harsh and bitter. Smooth textured entry, lovely on the palate; a little ground black pepper on a mouthful of cranberries. Very fruit forward. A fabulous aftertaste, dominated by spiced red fruit- wow! Such a lovely wine on the palate, so odd to be almost empty on the nose. 91/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4101
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1966 Smith Woodhouse

Post by flash_uk »

30% opacity, mature dusty red. Dusty red fruit on the nose. Lovely soft elegant mouthfeel, cranberries which are just beginning to dry out. Another fine port!
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1909
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1966 Smith Woodhouse

Post by winesecretary »

Pale orange rim. Pale garnet interior. Pontefract cakes and cherries on the nose. Rich and full on the palate with considerable red fruit. Even better on re-examination later. Got a point from me.
Post Reply