1992 Smith Woodhouse

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
Constandia
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 170
Joined: 10:07 Sun 27 Apr 2014

Re: 1992 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Constandia »

Nice nose, kirsch, tea, damson jam, plum and prune. I would have liked a little more acidity to balance against the sweetness however the finish is medium plus long. Not bad, in fact a very good port. 89/100
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1945
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

1992 Smith Woodhouse

Post by winesecretary »

A good rich red. Nose of licorice. A slight stink or pungency. On the palate, cherry. A bit one-note. Hot on finish. Disappointing.

Consumed 6/4/22.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14939
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1992 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Mature red colour, brick in tone; 70% opaque. Soft and mature fruit on the nose, delicious. Sweet fruit on the palate with a lovely balance of structure and finesse. Mouth-filling and delicious. Warm menthol on the aftertaste with slightly bitter fruit leading to a finish of candied cherry. A nice Port, rich and a little more full than a mid-weight Port. A good start to the tasting. 89/100. Tasted 06-Apr-22. Decanted 1 day.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4118
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1992 Smith Woodhouse

Post by flash_uk »

40% opacity, mature red, pink at the rim, slightly cloudy. Dusty red fruit. Lovely round, chewy mouthfeel, cherries, cranberries, nice balance.
Post Reply