Is the secondary market price for Port changing?

[Andy Velebil]

This.

Whilst it is difficult or impossible to find definitive laws covering all aspects of this debate, and acknowledging that there are exceptions and unusual circumstances to consider, the bottom line is that if the owners of a known and defined quinta that has been allocated a beneficio and subsequently registered a declared production quantity to its regulator, it's owners can't then punt out a wine sourced from somewhere else and name it after the quinta.

I look forward to reading the 5%, 10%, 15% per annum top-up and "it can come from anywhere" regulations. I am sure they will be a fascinating read.

This I agree with.

[MigSU]

The next live tasting will be a tense affair.

[DRT]

The next live tasting will be a tense affair.

They always are. Think of a Game of Thrones war council and you'll be getting close

[DRT]

Have we gone off-topic yet?

[Glenn E.]

The next live tasting will be a tense affair.

They always are. Think of a Game of Thrones war council and you'll be getting close

That used to be only when some yank brought the brown sticky stuff and people were forced to confront their biases. Has the War Council found some other reason to convene now?

[MigSU]

Is the secondary market price for Port changing? What do you guys think?

[Andy Velebil]

Is the secondary market price for Port changing? What do you guys think?

Depends on how much we all drink before the auctions starts

[uncle tom]

Well. I've just spent a little time digging and may have found a roadmap. It's a Manual of Certification and Control that is bang up to date (Oct '21) and lists on its second page all current legislation, but not all of it with links. The dates on the documents go back only to 2009 which suggests that older statutes and circulars may no longer be current.

https://www.ivdp.pt/media/zeglzfi0/manu ... o_2021.pdf

The only possible fly in the ointment here is that the introduction to the list of legislation requires compliance by all people who wish to trade in Port (etc) - whether manufacture is subject to additional and separate rules is not clear at this point.

As can be seen from the list of documents, it will take a little time to work through them.

[MigSU]

That's a good find. I'll take a closer look at it later.

[JacobH]

Well. I've just spent a little time digging and may have found a roadmap. It's a Manual of Certification and Control that is bang up to date (Oct '21) and lists on its second page all current legislation, but not all of it with links. The dates on the documents go back only to 2009 which suggests that older statutes and circulars may no longer be current.

The last few times I’ve looked at the IVDP regulations in any detail, I got the impression that they overhauled them in 2010 which might explain why the references don’t go back much earlier than that. I think the previous major revision was the one in the 1980s.

For what it is worth, I think one of the problems with these discussions and why they tend to go round and round in circles with very little citing of the regulations is the way the IVDP categorises the different categories. Whenever I have read the regulations, I think they set out the main categories (VP, LBV, Crusted, TWOIA etc.) but then there are at least five additional designations: single quinta, unfiltered / traditional, leve seco, rose and organic. Since these are additional designations, I think their definitions are not set out in the main regulations but somewhere else. The problem is that whilst a definition of, say, an organic Port is highly technical; SQVP & unfiltered LBV are really proper categories in their own right.

[Alex Bridgeman]

Well here’s the reference to not being allowed to mix “black” grapes with white grapes to make wine in the demarcated region.

http://www.governodosoutros.ics.ul.pt/i ... &accao=ver

[Doggett]

Should we invite the Head of the IVDP to a tasting, having provided detailed questions prior for him to clarify over some appropriately lovely Port? Then maybe we can put this thread drift to bed

[winesecretary]

@ JacobH and @ Doggett - ideally we would put to bed the thread drift not only by assessing what port properly is allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) now but also what was properly allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) at any one point in the last 100 years. A bit like the function on LexisNexis that allows you to look at what the legislation on many things was as well as what it is.

[JacobH]

@ JacobH and @ Doggett - ideally we would put to bed the thread drift not only by assessing what port properly is allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) now but also what was properly allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) at any one point in the last 100 years. A bit like the function on LexisNexis that allows you to look at what the legislation on many things was as well as what it is.

This strikes me as an excellent follow-up project for Julian: “Port Regulations: The Chronicle of Port Regulations, from the Beginning”.

[MigSU]

@ JacobH and @ Doggett - ideally we would put to bed the thread drift not only by assessing what port properly is allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) now but also what was properly allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) at any one point in the last 100 years. A bit like the function on LexisNexis that allows you to look at what the legislation on many things was as well as what it is.

This strikes me as an excellent follow-up project for Julian: “Port Regulations: The Chronicle of Port Regulations, from the Beginning”.

I can hear him deleting his TPF account as we speak.

[Glenn E.]

Well here’s the reference to not being allowed to mix “black” grapes with white grapes to make wine in the demarcated region.

http://www.governodosoutros.ics.ul.pt/i ... &accao=ver

Hmm... it is probably my browser, but the word "branco" does not appear on the page that comes up with that link.

Edit: Ah nevermind... "uva" is feminine so I should have searched for "branca". This doesn't look like a law that prevents their mixing, but rather a complaint (or documentation of a complaint?) that someone else did that. Which does imply that you're not supposed to...

[DRT]

@ JacobH and @ Doggett - ideally we would put to bed the thread drift not only by assessing what port properly is allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) now but also what was properly allowed to be made (and allowed to be sold) at any one point in the last 100 years. A bit like the function on LexisNexis that allows you to look at what the legislation on many things was as well as what it is.

This strikes me as an excellent follow-up project for Julian: “Port Regulations: The Chronicle of Port Regulations, from the Beginning”.

I can hear him deleting his TPF account as we speak.

It would be more likely that the IVDP would be calling their lawyers, again.

[jdaw1]

Should I ring up the IVDP (or better yet, go there in person) and ask?

That would be interesting, but good luck getting a straight answer!

It has worked for me.

[jdaw1]

Just a gentle reminder to folks, to ensure we keep the discussion calm and respectful while disagreeing, please.

Hugs and flowers to everyone.

[hadge]

Watched something very interesting in relation to the secondary market today, which made me think of this thread and i believe a few others watched what happened.

First port lot of 2x Dow 1927 with an estimate of £600-800, the price realised was £2,695, due to being 1927 I thought fair enough price, if on the high side of things. not sure which country the buyer was bidding from.

Then i was just blown a way with the next lot,

Quinta do Noval 1931, 9 bottles, with an estimate of £14,000-18,000, I was surprised when the auctioner opened with £40,000 on his book. The hammer went down at £80,000 to a buyer in Thailand, with BP total price realised was £98,000 (base on figure on website), just wow, £10,888 per bottle of vintage port.

There was generally more normal prices being reached even if they where a little on the higher side than normal. until there was a case of Graham's 1963 around £310 per bottle, you can buy this cheaper retail.

I believe that what happened above was a one off with a few very hungary bidders.

It depends on your view of what a bargin is but I felt there was a few around the place today and picked up a couple of things including another mag plus a few more 84's and a couple of other things. I feel that the slow price rises are around to stay for the longer term and it seem there there is a few other areas of world joining the port market (please correct me if wrong about them being new markets).

[Glenn E.]

Quinta do Noval 1931, 9 bottles, with an estimate of £14,000-18,000, I was surprised when the auctioner opened with £40,000 on his book. The hammer went down at £80,000 to a buyer in Thailand, with BP total price realised was £98,000 (base on figure on website), just wow, £10,888 per bottle of vintage port.

That's actually about right, at least from the last few (very few) sales that I've heard of. The last sales of NN31 that I knew of had all been in the $10,000 range per bottle, but those were also 5+ years ago. Given the ever-decreasing supply of both Ports, this lot at around $14,400 per bottle including BP doesn't seem all that out of character. For comparison, the 1875 D'Oliveiras Malvasia Family Reserve has gone from around $840/bottle to $1450/bottle during the same time frame.

Since I've heard arguments about which is better, I've always lumped them together in my head. So perhaps part of the surprise in this sale comes from the fact that it is "regular" Noval and not Nacional?

£2,695 for 2 x D27 doesn't seem high to me at all. I've been trying to find the "next 4" Grahams for my vertical, those being 1942, 1935, 1927, and 1924, and they start around $1500-$1800/bottle and reach $2500-$3000/bottle for the two older bottles. At those prices, my vertical will probably never extend beyond its current end point of 1945.

[Alex Bridgeman]

The thing about the Dow 1927 which struck me was that one bottle was amended by saleroom notice to be low shoulder, so effectively the hammer price of £2,200 (+ bp of 27% if you're in the UK) meant a price to a UK buyer for the one good bottle of about £2,500.

And Glenn - you just have to invite the right people to take part in your Graham vertical tasting to be able to easily extend it back beyond 1945. Particularly those who have decided not to work any more and so can drop everything to jump on a plane to fly to the west coast with only a little bit of notice,

[uncle tom]

So perhaps part of the surprise in this sale comes from the fact that it is "regular" Noval and not Nacional?

The NN vineyard was still very young in '31. I'm not sure there's been a note on this wine from a reliable source that hasn't included some element of disappointment in the past forty years. It's reputation seems to stem almost entirely from it's endorsement by the late Michael Broadbent.

N31 vs N34 seems a much more interesting contest today.

[JacobH]

The “straight” 1931 Noval gets consistently good reviews: is it possible that Michael Broadbent switched them by mistake in a note?

[uncle tom]

is it possible that Michael Broadbent switched them by mistake in a note?

He was pretty diligent, but of course, when offered a wine like that by a host, he would often have to take their word for it as to its identity.