Hi all!
I recently stumbled across this one, and don't know what to think about it...LBV, Tawny,...
My guess would be Tawny, but wouldn't bet a penny on my opinio...maybe some people around here with better insight?
Thanks
Andy
Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
- Attachments
-
- dow.jpg (41.79 KiB) Viewed 4612 times
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
Bottle shape is tawny.
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
A "V.V.O." label implies tawny, as ruby Ports are bottled at a young age and so you would not label them VVO.
I've never seen a label like that, though, nor am I familiar with anything of the sort from Dow.
I've never seen a label like that, though, nor am I familiar with anything of the sort from Dow.
Glenn Elliott
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
Agree with allGlenn E. wrote:A "V.V.O." label implies tawny, as ruby Ports are bottled at a young age and so you would not label them VVO.
I've never seen a label like that, though, nor am I familiar with anything of the sort from Dow.
That said. It has a very low fill and heavy signs of seepage, which is not a good sign regardless.
- JacobH
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
“Old Port” was the pre-modern terminology for “tawny” for the reasons Glenn sets out so I don’t think there can be any doubt about what this is.
Indeed, it was potentially quite a nice wine at the time it was bottled. From the Croft 1962 pricelist which I posted elsewhere I think the hierarchy went something like “Fine Old”, then “Very Fine” or “Very Old” and so “Very Very Old” might be saved for something quite special.
Indeed, it was potentially quite a nice wine at the time it was bottled. From the Croft 1962 pricelist which I posted elsewhere I think the hierarchy went something like “Fine Old”, then “Very Fine” or “Very Old” and so “Very Very Old” might be saved for something quite special.
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
Thanks for your thoughts and replies.
As for age it seems to be clear that VVO is 40+ years, see here
http://www.drturnbull.co.uk/infoportwin ... signations.
"6e. Aged Tawnies (super - 8).
Aged Tawnies or Tawnies with indication of age (Porto com indicação de idade) are blends of Port Wines maturing in casks for long, up to a very long time. The categories are: 10 years, 20 years, 30 years and More than 40 years or Over 40 years. The use of this final indication is not allowed in the USA where it is simply known as: 40 years. It is allowed to indicate Tawnies of 10 and 20 years old with “Velho” or “Old” and those older than 30 years and over 40 years with “Muito velho” or “Very old”."
My guess would be a bottling date sometime in the 70ies; for this age the level/ullage doesn't seem so bad to me, of course o leaker is always risky to buy.
The glass is definetely genuine, embossed with DOW's seal.
Any objective about how much I could risk for the bottle...would 70 USD be appropriate, what do you think?
Thanks
Andy
As for age it seems to be clear that VVO is 40+ years, see here
http://www.drturnbull.co.uk/infoportwin ... signations.
"6e. Aged Tawnies (super - 8).
Aged Tawnies or Tawnies with indication of age (Porto com indicação de idade) are blends of Port Wines maturing in casks for long, up to a very long time. The categories are: 10 years, 20 years, 30 years and More than 40 years or Over 40 years. The use of this final indication is not allowed in the USA where it is simply known as: 40 years. It is allowed to indicate Tawnies of 10 and 20 years old with “Velho” or “Old” and those older than 30 years and over 40 years with “Muito velho” or “Very old”."
My guess would be a bottling date sometime in the 70ies; for this age the level/ullage doesn't seem so bad to me, of course o leaker is always risky to buy.
The glass is definetely genuine, embossed with DOW's seal.
Any objective about how much I could risk for the bottle...would 70 USD be appropriate, what do you think?
Thanks
Andy
- JacobH
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
The regulations which are quoted there date from the mid-1980s. I’m not sure if there were similar provisions before that about the labeling of non-vintage ports.
I wouldn’t have any doubt the bottle is genuine. Silva & Cosens (in the bottom left) was the company name through which Dow’s was traded until quite recently for historic reasons.
Putting to one side the debate as to whether tawny Ports are capable of being aged in bottles, considering the low fill level and leakage, I wouldn’t expect it to be drinkable so don’t pay more for it than you think it is worth as an ornament!
I wouldn’t have any doubt the bottle is genuine. Silva & Cosens (in the bottom left) was the company name through which Dow’s was traded until quite recently for historic reasons.
Putting to one side the debate as to whether tawny Ports are capable of being aged in bottles, considering the low fill level and leakage, I wouldn’t expect it to be drinkable so don’t pay more for it than you think it is worth as an ornament!
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
I can almost guarantee that it will be drinkable. Depending on your preferences, you may even like it. However I doubt that it will be spectacular... possibly not even excellent.
I recently purchased and consumed a 1934 Dalva Colheita that was bottled in 1972. 38 years in wood followed by 48 years in bottle. I paid $360 for that bottle, and additional bottles were sold by the same auction site in the same price range. (Bidding started at $350, but I didn't track any of the subsequent auctions as I'd already snagged a bottle.)
It was fine; even good. I tend to give higher ratings that others here on this forum, but I gave it 91 points. If I had to guess, the people here would have probably been in the 87-88 range. Nothing to write home about, but it was a nice Port and a fun experiment. Had someone brought it to a party, I would have happily poured another glass to drink if it were available. I have also described to others as "there was nothing wrong about it at all; the problem, such as it was, was that there was really nothing right about it either." I wouldn't buy more at that price, but I'm not sad that I purchased one to share with friends.
$70 US seems fine risk level for your bottle, more so for the unique experience than for any expectation of superior quality.
Glenn Elliott
- JacobH
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anyone know this Dow? Designation: "Very Very Old"
Sorry: I should have defined “drinkable” as “pleasant if not enjoyable to drink” rather than merely non-toxic!
I think my hit rate for old bottles of filtered port is about 50%. I presume this is mostly a combination of filtration reducing its ability to age and cheaper corks which are more likely to fail. I was particularly pessimistic about this bottle due to the fill level and the leak on the selo!