Apostrophe crimes

Talk about anything but keep it polite and reasonably clean.
User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2732
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by flash_uk » 23:01 Mon 05 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote:
20:48 Mon 05 Jun 2017
On Android using the Google Keyboard, switch to number input (hit the ?123 button) then hold down the hyphen to see other options.

:)
Any tips for iOS? :D

Edit: Ah. Same thing works on iOS! Many thanks!

Glenn E.
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3357
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Glenn E. » 16:55 Tue 06 Jun 2017

flash_uk wrote:
23:01 Mon 05 Jun 2017
Glenn E. wrote:
20:48 Mon 05 Jun 2017
On Android using the Google Keyboard, switch to number input (hit the ?123 button) then hold down the hyphen to see other options.

:)
Any tips for iOS? :D
Get a new phone?
:twisted:
Glenn Elliott

Glenn E.
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3357
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Glenn E. » 22:00 Wed 14 Jun 2017

Andy Velebil wrote:
21:11 Wed 14 Jun 2017
The "hills" by my house are over 4,000' (~ 13,000 meters).
Math is hard. ;-)
Glenn Elliott

Andy Velebil
Dow 1980
Posts: 2538
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Andy Velebil » 22:08 Wed 14 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote:
21:11 Wed 14 Jun 2017
The "hills" by my house are over 4,000' (~ 13,000 meters).
Math is hard. ;-)
Hahha. One too many zeros on that. Damn phone. 1,300 meters. That better?

And the peaks behind that are higher. Though I think Eric in Colorado has us all beat at over 10,000 foot peaks there. Though I have skied at about 13,000 feet in Telluride Colorado and breathing during exertion gets a bit tougher at that elevation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Glenn E.
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3357
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Glenn E. » 05:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017

Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.
Glenn Elliott

PhilW
Dow 1980
Posts: 2706
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by PhilW » 08:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote:
05:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017
Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.
That's nothing; when I was a lad our parents would make my brother and I go t'top of Mount Everest before breakfast, with no Oxygen, or ice axes - or shoes; have a boxing match on the summit and t'loser had to carry t'winner back down while singing God save the Queen, and if we didn't do it quick enough they made us dig our own graves, bury ourselves, and then they would dance on our graves singing Hallelujah. TPF members of today think they have it tough, pah!

User avatar
Old Bridge
Warre’s Traditional LBV
Posts: 337
Joined: 11:33 Thu 22 Dec 2016
Location: Telemark, Norway

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Old Bridge » 09:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017

PhilW wrote:
08:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017
Glenn E. wrote:
05:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017
Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.
That's nothing; when I was a lad our parents would make my brother and I go t'top of Mount Everest before breakfast, with no Oxygen, or ice axes - or shoes; have a boxing match on the summit and t'loser had to carry t'winner back down while singing God save the Queen, and if we didn't do it quick enough they made us dig our own graves, bury ourselves, and then they would dance on our graves singing Hallelujah. TPF members of today think they have it tough, pah!
Brilliant!!
MP come alive again.

Andy Velebil
Dow 1980
Posts: 2538
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by Andy Velebil » 15:17 Thu 15 Jun 2017

Hahahah!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 21:58 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote:
05:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017
skied at 12,000' in Colorado
Phil’s reprimand was good, and, generously, he even left an error for others to spot. In a thread entitled ‘Apostrophe crimes’ everybody will have noticed Glenn’s incorrect use of a straight single quote (“'”, U+0027) rather than the prime symbol (“”, U+2032). Tut tut.

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 14:37 Fri 01 Sep 2017

jdaw1 wrote:
20:31 Thu 31 Aug 2017
Thank you
I confess to the omission of a terminating full stop.

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 00:31 Sat 13 Jan 2018

Image

User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2732
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by flash_uk » 15:05 Sat 13 Jan 2018

I suspect many others are thinking exactly what I'm thinking after seeing this.

John Owlett
Cockburn’s Special Reserve
Posts: 38
Joined: 23:26 Wed 04 Dec 2013
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by John Owlett » 16:25 Sat 13 Jan 2018

Remarkable attention to detail: I have a Casio digital watch exactly like that one.

User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2732
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by flash_uk » 20:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018

idj123 wrote:
18:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018
Yes please! Does OBV count as an 'awful shipper's?

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 15:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018

flash_uk wrote:
20:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018
idj123 wrote:
18:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018
Yes please! Does OBV count as an 'awful shipper's?
Flash is being hard. In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original, whilst recognising that the new grammatical context required a singular. It was done clumsily, but I would not have rebuked this — indeed, didn’t.

Maybe I’m just becoming gentle in my dotage.

idj123
Warre’s Otima 20 year old Tawny
Posts: 704
Joined: 20:54 Tue 13 Nov 2012

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by idj123 » 15:01 Sun 11 Mar 2018

This was typographical rather than grammatical with the second quotation mark inadvertently being inserted before the 's' rather than after and thus becoming an unintentional apostrophe.

User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2732
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by flash_uk » 17:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018

I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 23:06 Sun 11 Mar 2018

flash_uk wrote:
17:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018
I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.
jdaw1 wrote:
15:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018
In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original

User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2732
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by flash_uk » 00:01 Mon 12 Mar 2018

jdaw1 wrote:
23:06 Sun 11 Mar 2018
flash_uk wrote:
17:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018
I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.
jdaw1 wrote:
15:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018
In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original
Yes "no awful shippers" in the first post, but if one then discusses a single bottle, the question would be is it "an awful shipper". Can't have "an awful shippers".

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 00:23 Mon 12 Mar 2018

He wanted to quote my original.

Yes, I agree, the sentence could have tortured a bit (“would OBV breach “no awful shippers”?”), but I sufficiently sympathetic to the mixed pluralisation from the quotation.

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 22:50 Sat 31 Mar 2018

It is very unlikely that this is correct:

Image

User avatar
AHB
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11872
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by AHB » 12:59 Tue 03 Apr 2018

I think this is debateable. I would have said " readers' " but each of the many true stories would have come from a single individual reader. If that was the case, would the use have been acceptable?
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 23:12 Tue 03 Apr 2018

AHB wrote:
12:59 Tue 03 Apr 2018
I think this is debateable. I would have said " readers' " but each of the many true stories would have come from a single individual reader. If that was the case, would the use have been acceptable?
Unless a single reader supplied all the stories, it’s wrong. Compare: the boys’ oranges: each boy allocated on orange, still, multiple boys.

Consistent with:
jdaw1 wrote:
22:50 Sat 31 Mar 2018
It is very unlikely that this is correct

User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15222
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by DRT » 13:39 Fri 13 Apr 2018

From The Metro's article on Gateshead Council’s ‘smoke screen’ denial about 5G in their street lights, and spectacular in more ways than one...
Kim Newton wrote:My dads sisters daughters boyfriend’s sister works in at bewicks and she says its true, she thinks she heard 2 councillors discussing it over chocolate chip muffins.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20498
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Post by jdaw1 » 16:03 Sat 28 Jul 2018

In The Economist!Image

Post Reply