2015 declarations
- uncle tom
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Near Saffron Walden, England
Re: 2015 declarations
So with the Symingtons, TFP and Sogrape all declaring their SQs for 2015, it now looks certain that we are not looking at a split declaration, but a general declaration for 2016.
- I wonder whether the Symingtons will also declare a 2016 Cockburn?
- I wonder whether the Symingtons will also declare a 2016 Cockburn?
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Re: 2015 declarations
The end of the line for the smaller Symington brands: not Smith Woodhouse; nor Gould Campbell; nor Quarles Harris; nor Martinez.
Please post a link for the Sogrape declarations.
Cockburn’s total seems to be 3500+110+33+33⅓ = 3676⅓ dozen.
Please post a link for the Sogrape declarations.
Cockburn’s total seems to be 3500+110+33+33⅓ = 3676⅓ dozen.
Re: 2015 declarations
uncle tom wrote: ↑09:58 Mon 24 Apr 2017After the 2015 vintage there was general contentment that it was 'good enough' to declare, but there was a lack of real excitement. It was also evident that the four year gap since the 2011 vintage meant that a declaration was needed, and the vintage was being banked as a declaration long before the 2016 vintage showed its hand.
I suppose time will tell, but given the widespread problems with the 2016 harvest I think it is rather too early to be certain or even hopeful of a general declaration.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
- uncle tom
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Near Saffron Walden, England
Re: 2015 declarations
My reasoning is that if the Syms and TFP were not confident that 2016 would make the grade, they would have declared '15. It does seem likely though, that a 2016 general declaration will have some well known smaller producers absent from the party - some of those who got their spraying regimes awry suffered grievously in 2016.I suppose time will tell, but given the widespread problems with the 2016 harvest I think it is rather too early to be certain or even hopeful of a general declaration.
It is very bad news for a small producer to have to miss a general declaration, or be faced with offering a wine that is going to be severely outgunned by the big names. I do hope that the decision to pass on 2015 was entirely driven by quality, rather than marketing tactics..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
I've heard very mixed things about 2015. There were ripening issues due to the overall weather during the year and during harvest. What I've been hearing from a variety of sources, 2015 has turned out not to be anywhere near as good as first expected during harvest and shortly after. Small issues tend to come to the front quickly as they spend a winter or two in barrel.uncle tom wrote: ↑12:15 Tue 02 May 2017My reasoning is that if the Syms and TFP were not confident that 2016 would make the grade, they would have declared '15. It does seem likely though, that a 2016 general declaration will have some well known smaller producers absent from the party - some of those who got their spraying regimes awry suffered grievously in 2016.I suppose time will tell, but given the widespread problems with the 2016 harvest I think it is rather too early to be certain or even hopeful of a general declaration.
It is very bad news for a small producer to have to miss a general declaration, or be faced with offering a wine that is going to be severely outgunned by the big names. I do hope that the decision to pass on 2015 was entirely driven by quality, rather than marketing tactics..
2016 was difficult due to the start/stop nature of it and the overall slow ripening during the year. However, if one had the patience and resources to wait and pick only those grapes which were ready were rewarded with some awesome musts. It's probably safe to make the assumption that many small producers, who don't have block planting and/or the means to upend their normal picking patterns, ended up with not so good musts from 2016. That's a short and somewhat simple explanation but 2016 really was a year where the larger companies with more resources* have probably turned out far better musts.
*resources include money, labor, ability to pick only small sections of their vineyards when they were actually ripe, then coming back to other sections later, space to ferment and store small lots of musts, etc.
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Dont have a link for Sogrape, talking to people.
Sogevinus does Burmester Arnozelo and Calem (full)
Axel
Sogevinus does Burmester Arnozelo and Calem (full)
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Grahams Malvedos
Dow Bomfim
Both for later release.
Dow Bomfim
Both for later release.
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
- christopherpfaff
- Warre’s Warrior
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 11:07 Fri 16 Mar 2012
- Location: Kassel - Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
there was already a lot of talking about the vintageyear 2015.
I talked to
Dirk Niepoort,
Francisca van Zeller &
Tiago Alves de Sousa
some weeks ago and produced a little video with their statements:
https://youtu.be/zomvyFb1WZ4
I talked to
Dirk Niepoort,
Francisca van Zeller &
Tiago Alves de Sousa
some weeks ago and produced a little video with their statements:
https://youtu.be/zomvyFb1WZ4
"An one litre bottle [of port] is the right size for two persons, if one person doesn´t drink." - Dirk Niepoort
--------
http://www.passion-port.de
--------
http://www.passion-port.de
Re: 2015 declarations
was just at a 2015's release tasting with Rupert and Charles.
they did tell a story about h ow Cockburn likes to release certain odd years.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: 2015 declarations
oh i'll add that the Symingtons gives their warm regards to my fellow forumites.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Although they send out samples, Andresen decided last week not to bottle.
-1
Axel
-1
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Seara d'Ordens and Churchill Quinta da Gricha
Axel
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Just back from the Douro... It seems that some producers are still in line to have their Ports approved. Some even are doing it for the second time. I have some problems with that as all of their 2014 have passed at the first time and are a lot weaker in style.
So we are looking for quite some producers to bottle/ declare soon.
Axel
So we are looking for quite some producers to bottle/ declare soon.
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
So you're saying they aren't being approved the first time being tested? As I've said on FTLOP, generally speaking I don't think 2015 is turning out that great after all. Of course some gems will no doubt be produced as is almost always the case, just speaking generally.Axel P wrote: ↑10:42 Mon 29 May 2017 Just back from the Douro... It seems that some producers are still in line to have their Ports approved. Some even are doing it for the second time. I have some problems with that as all of their 2014 have passed at the first time and are a lot weaker in style.
So we are looking for quite some producers to bottle/ declare soon.
Axel
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
Actually I am saying that I have no problems at all with the 2015 Vintage Ports. Just tasted the Niepoorts yesterday: http://worldofport.de/Wein/tasting/Niep ... poort.html
I do not understand why some of the producer's 2015s are not approved at the first time, but their 2014s were, although the 2014 were the weaker Ports.
From what I have seen so far, it will be a fantastic year and the Port industry is giving away some potentially great PR, but I also understand why some producers are reluctant to declare two or more years in a row.
Axel
I do not understand why some of the producer's 2015s are not approved at the first time, but their 2014s were, although the 2014 were the weaker Ports.
From what I have seen so far, it will be a fantastic year and the Port industry is giving away some potentially great PR, but I also understand why some producers are reluctant to declare two or more years in a row.
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
Re: 2015 declarations
I think it's difficult to say that in general. 2014 produced some superb Port - or could have - but you had to harvest at exactly the right time and get a little bit lucky. I was surprised and disappointed that Graham did not bottle a 2014 Stone Terraces, because we tasted it on the Harvest Tour and it was splendid though of course very young. I guess the 2015 version was simply even better, so they chose to declare 2015 instead. But that then in turn makes me wonder about 2016... and what are Graham's plans for Stone Terraces? Would the declare 3 years in a row if they were all good enough? Or do they intend to release it more like a regular VP, or even more restricted like a VVV or VC super cuvee?
Anyway... I've heard many of the same things that Andy alluded to. 2015 is solid, but not great. Some will produce outstanding Port as is always the case, but it seems like generally speaking it's only maybe an above average year. It would be "good enough" to declare if they were desperate, but if 2016 is already looking better then it makes sense to wait.
Glenn Elliott
- uncle tom
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Near Saffron Walden, England
Re: 2015 declarations
There was a sudden scramble to get those grapes in before the rain, and although the PR people played the line of them being 'harvested in perfect condition' it required a leap of faith to believe that.I was surprised and disappointed that Graham did not bottle a 2014 Stone Terraces
Graham are clearly taking the development of their new 'super cuvee' very seriously, and a willingness to set a high bar and not bottle those years that fail to excel is worthy of respect.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
And that appears to be exactly what Niepoort did with their grapes in 2015, no?uncle tom wrote: ↑09:08 Thu 01 Jun 2017There was a sudden scramble to get those grapes in before the rain, and although the PR people played the line of them being 'harvested in perfect condition' it required a leap of faith to believe that.I was surprised and disappointed that Graham did not bottle a 2014 Stone Terraces
- Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14935
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: 2015 declarations
Anyone who I have not already contacted and who would like to be part of a collective purchase of either Noval's 2015 vintage port or SFE's vintage ports please drop me a PM or an email as soon as you can. Thanks.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 2015 declarations
I did not have any astonishing 2014s yet, anyone?
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
- uncle tom
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Near Saffron Walden, England
Re: 2015 declarations
I've not tried many, but so far none have been remarkable.
On my vintage weighting scale, which assesses both quality and significance and averages out at 1.0, I currently have it down as a 0.2
Previous years to score 0.2 include 1952, 1965, 1986, 1988, 2010 & 2012
On my vintage weighting scale, which assesses both quality and significance and averages out at 1.0, I currently have it down as a 0.2
Previous years to score 0.2 include 1952, 1965, 1986, 1988, 2010 & 2012
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Re: 2015 declarations
That's not the way the story went when we were at Quinta dos Malvedos on the harvest tour in 2014. It was earlier than expected, yes, but the grapes were actually harvested comfortably before the rain so it wasn't a scramble. Whether or not they were in "perfect condition" is likely subject to typical winemaker hyperbole, but the grapes were pretty clearly harvested when they wanted to do it, not when forced to do it by impending weather.uncle tom wrote: ↑09:08 Thu 01 Jun 2017There was a sudden scramble to get those grapes in before the rain, and although the PR people played the line of them being 'harvested in perfect condition' it required a leap of faith to believe that.I was surprised and disappointed that Graham did not bottle a 2014 Stone Terraces
I fully agree with this sentiment. But while I do still feel that 2014 was worthy of bottling, if 2015 was even better and they'd rather not bottle in successive years, then by all means bottle 2015 over 2014.Graham are clearly taking the development of their new 'super cuvee' very seriously, and a willingness to set a high bar and not bottle those years that fail to excel is worthy of respect.
Glenn Elliott
- uncle tom
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Near Saffron Walden, England
Re: 2015 declarations
My impression is that they are not going to be squeamish about back to back Stone Terraces declarations, but that part of the strategy to eventually dethrone Nacional is to build up a catalogue of wines that is bereft of weaklings, by showing a greater willingness to blend away those vintages that are less than superb.
Whilst the lagar samples of the '14 may have looked really good, negative traits might easily have surfaced over the subsequent months..
Whilst the lagar samples of the '14 may have looked really good, negative traits might easily have surfaced over the subsequent months..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill