New Style

Make suggestions and report problems.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:┓ˆâ”“ˆâ”“ˆ #e9e9c7 ┓ˆâ”“ˆâ”“ˆ
┓ˆâ”“ˆâ”“ˆ #e9e9b5 ┓ˆâ”“ˆâ”“ˆ
Done. Too yellow.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

I like this. It perhaps needs a small tweak to take the shades very slightly further apart.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

This page is too yellow.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

try =#e9e9c7 and #e9e9f9
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:try =#e9e9c7 and #e9e9f9
A bit too white, but I can live with those.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:try =#e9e9c7 and #e9e9f9
A bit too white, but I can live with those.
Not what I was after. What I thought would be a lighter shade of #e9e9c7 has turned out to be blue.

My PC is not good for this sort of thing. Can you please pick a shade which is slightly lighter but fundamentally the same colour as #e9e9c7 and combine it with that colour?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

#e9e9c7 and #f4f4e2
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

This works for me. If it works for you can we leave it for others to comment?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

f4f4e2 is too near white for me.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:f4f4e2 is too near white for me.
#e9e9c7 is about as dark as I think we should go. Can what is currently #f4f4e2 be darkened slightly so that it isn't too near white but still distinguishable from #e9e9c7?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

Why does the Board Index not have the same background colour as the individual Forums and threads?

This seems inconsistent with your view that some colours are too white.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

Do #dfdfbf and #e7e7cf work for you? Distinct from each other and from white, yet still both pale yellow.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:Do #dfdfbf and #e7e7cf work for you? Distinct from each other and from white, yet still both pale yellow.
Done. OK?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:Why does the Board Index not have the same background colour as the individual Forums and threads?

This seems inconsistent with your view that some colours are too white.
My objection isn’t to too white. It is that all non-white colours should be distinct from white.

The board index is different to the “individual Forums and threads†. It is of fixed size and arrangement. So having any alternation of colours in that would mean that one subset of boards are permanently set to be the same colour as each other, and different to the remaining boards. I didn’t like that.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:I can only list what is relevant to me. And even then only what is relevant to me now. My current list is as follows:
  1. Backgrounds should be 2 slightly different shades of the same colour. Preferrably a boring and non-garish colour.
  2. Buttons outside posts should be the default grey style. See "Reply" and the search box and button next to it above each thread. The Reply button is a different style, is out of line and occassionally has text leaking from underneath it. Removing the search box and button would not be a good solution as some people may use it. Consistency in style, colour and alignment would be very good.
  3. Re-instatement of the forum links at the top of threads.
  4. Can't think of any more right now.
  1. Backgrounds being negotiated. Awaiting next version from DRT, or a concession that it ain’t so bad.
  2. Buttons awaiting comment on search box.
  3. Forum links reinstated, but in navigation area that contains page numbers. Can be moved again if really wanted.
  4. Unfixable.
4. The TPF logo in the header should be larger at around 165% of its current size.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Do #dfdfbf and #e7e7cf work for you? Distinct from each other and from white, yet still both pale yellow.
Done. OK?
Yes, done. And yes, OK with me. But are they OK with you?
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:The TPF logo in the header should be larger at around 165% of its current size.
You wanted it small. Currently 32 by 32: choose a size 16n-by-16n for any integer n. Setting n=3 would be 50% larger in width and height, but 125% larger in area.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:Why does the Board Index not have the same background colour as the individual Forums and threads?

This seems inconsistent with your view that some colours are too white.
My objection isn’t to too white. It is that all non-white colours should be distinct from white.

The board index is different to the “individual Forums and threads†. It is of fixed size and arrangement. So having any alternation of colours in that would mean that one subset of boards are permanently set to be the same colour as each other, and different to the remaining boards. I didn’t like that.
Agreed. Inconsistency in or interuption to the alternation would be bad. But the Board Index doesn't look like it belongs to the same style as the forum and thread pages. Could we just choose one of the background colours and use that on the Board Index?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:The TPF logo in the header should be larger at around 165% of its current size.
You wanted it small. Currently 32 by 32: choose a size 16n-by-16n for any integer n. Setting n=3 would be 50% larger in width and height, but 125% larger in area.
No. I absolutely did not ask for the logo to be small. I asked for the text to be small because people sitting at desks 300 feet behind me in the office could read what site I was on. The logo should be larger than it is now. 165% is a guess and I will ask you to change it when I see the result. What I would like is for the text in the header to remain as it is now with the logo extendning the same vertical distance above and below it.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:Could we just choose one of the background colours and use that on the Board Index?
Done, but I don’t like it.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:Could we just choose one of the background colours and use that on the Board Index?
Done, but I don’t like it.
It is still white on my screen. Have you backed it out?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:It is still white on my screen. Have you backed it out?
Still pale yellow on mine.
DRT wrote:No. I absolutely did not ask for the logo to be small. I asked for the text to be small because people sitting at desks 300 feet behind me in the office could read what site I was on. The logo should be larger than it is now. 165% is a guess and I will ask you to change it when I see the result. What I would like is for the text in the header to remain as it is now with the logo extendning the same vertical distance above and below it.
Vertical centring slightly tricky. Logo now 48 by 48, which is too big for the text. I preferred 32 by 32.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:It is still white on my screen. Have you backed it out?
Still pale yellow on mine.
The change has found its way through to my screen. I don't like it either.
jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:No. I absolutely did not ask for the logo to be small. I asked for the text to be small because people sitting at desks 300 feet behind me in the office could read what site I was on. The logo should be larger than it is now. 165% is a guess and I will ask you to change it when I see the result. What I would like is for the text in the header to remain as it is now with the logo extendning the same vertical distance above and below it.
Vertical centring slightly tricky. Logo now 48 by 48, which is too big for the text. I preferred 32 by 32.
Have sent an email with a screenshot.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: New Style

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Still pale yellow on mine.
The change has found its way through to my screen. I don't like it either.
Reverted to white with yellow hovering.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4186
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: New Style

Post by Glenn E. »

I like the two alternating colors currently being used - I'll call them khaki and light khaki in case they change again. :lol:
Glenn Elliott
Post Reply