Page 1 of 5

We're on Google!

Posted: 10:39 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
Yes, that should mean some extra traffic and maybe some new members - people we've not even met before :shock: .

Posted: 11:26 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by DRT
Do you think we will attract some women?

Posted: 11:30 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
I think plural is a bit optimistic.

Posted: 12:55 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
Derek,
you've posted a picture of you as a Skinhead, you've got a dark satanic tree as your avatar and your desperate for women!!!
Its not the method Brad Pitt uses. :D

Alan

Posted: 13:02 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
Haven't you seen 12 Monkeys?

Posted: 13:08 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by DRT
Conky wrote:Derek,
you've posted a picture of you as a Skinhead, you've got a dark satanic tree as your avatar and your desperate for women!!!
Its not the method Brad Pitt uses. :D

Alan
Brad Pitt doesn't have my charm, wit and personality and, IMHO, is a bit on the skinny side. Jo often tells me she would rather have me than Brad Pitt, and I for one believe her :roll:

Derek

Posted: 13:10 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by DRT
....and it's only you who thinks it's a tree :?

Posted: 15:32 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
It must make you proud to think you have a son who will be able to communicate with Luc on his level!
Make sure he keeps up with his French lessons at school. :)

And while I'm on, something tells me the picture Luc posts of himself is not going to be as straight forward as we hoped!

Great news about Google.

Alan

TPF on google

Posted: 16:54 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=152#152]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:TPF is now listed in The Open Directory Project (though might take a few hours to appear). When google next takes a copy of the ODP’s free data it will appear in the Google directory. Both of these will help the search engine rankings.
I’m taking credit for that good news.

Posted: 17:13 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
Of course self praise is no praise....but sod it! Well done Julian. :D

Alan

Posted: 17:19 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
Don't forget that Treacle was the one that submitted it.

Posted: 17:25 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
Fairy Snuff! (this could go on a bit)

Thanks to Treacle and Jdaw1 !!!


I hope this isn't like the Monty Python sketch 'What have the Romans ever done for us?' :D :D :D

Posted: 17:28 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
...and don't forget who confirmed all of those search engine submissions...

Posted: 17:46 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
I will refer the Honourable Gentlemen to the answer I gave some moments ago!

With acknowledgements to Hansard.

Posted: 18:00 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
Actually Treacle has frequently had work published in Hansard, but I did all the confirmations. She ran a process and I got a bloody great pile of e-mails to respond to.

Posted: 19:31 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by DRT
I have heard of strategies that you can adopt which ensure your website is returned at the top of the list on google etc when someone searches for key words and phrases. Is this something we could do?

Derek

SEO

Posted: 20:20 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by jdaw1
There are a variety of things.

Somewhere phpBB might allows settings for the HTML meta tags

Code: Select all

<title>…</title>
<meta content="…" name=description>
<meta content="…" name=keywords>
where the ellipses should be set to the title of the thread, the first 180 characters of the first post, and the name of the thread (details).


Also, we want incoming links. Do you have personal websites? Do they have a link to a post within TPF? (Mine does.) Incoming links are the best.


Lastly, and best of all, it to have lots of content that seems ‘genuine’ to google’s secret algorithm. This we’re doing the natural way.

Posted: 20:43 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
There are some dodgy methods but if the Google bods work it out (which they will) they will remove the site. Best off doing what we're doing and, as JDAW says, get one way links to the site.

Fixing the meta tags isn’t dodgy

Posted: 20:54 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by jdaw1
jdaw1 wrote:Somewhere phpBB might allows settings for the HTML meta tags

Code: Select all

<title>…</title>
<meta content="…" name=description>
<meta content="…" name=keywords>
where the ellipses should be set to the title of the thread, the first 180 characters of the first post, and the name of the thread (details).
KillerB wrote:There are some dodgy methods
Fixing the meta tags to have descriptions and keywords isn’t dodgy. It’s recommended HTML practice.

Posted: 20:58 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by Conky
Killer B's location, The Sky Blue City, reminds me of the time I decided to check out Coventry Citys New Ground the Ricoh Arena for a game. I knew I was close and it was just about kick off time. I asked a local for final directions. The bloke said it was only a bit down the road and then a left. He also said that when I got there, I'd see TWO queues of people, a Big one and a small one. He advised me not to join the Big one, as that was for the Chippy! :D

Alan

Posted: 21:08 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
I wasn't talking about that jdaw, I was talking about repetitive hidden keywords, unrelated keywords, stolen content etc. Our submitted keywords are all related to Port and wine.

Reading back it does look like I was referring to your recommendation but I wasn't I was expanding on what could be done.

Treacle has some Google Ads vouchers which should get us pumped up a bit, she's also going to check where we can put meta tags as it's not in the Admin panel.

SEO agreement

Posted: 21:30 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by jdaw1
OK, we’re agreed. We do (or have already done) the cheap kosher things, and then let nature take its course.

Posted: 21:34 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by KillerB
Agreed.

Oh and send e-mails to everyone.

Where “everyone† means “everyone we actually know†

Posted: 21:56 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by jdaw1
KillerB wrote:send e-mails to everyone.
Where “everyone† means “everyone we actually know†, rather than everyone.

Posted: 22:35 Mon 25 Jun 2007
by DRT
You lost me at Meta Tags but you seem to have it in hand :wink:

.....and this my 200th post :D