Some examples:
- Niepoort 1977, tasting measure;
Niepoort 1977, drinking measure;
Taylor 1994, drinking measure;
Dow 1977, drinking measure.
Oh how dreadful! Boring. Anal. If I had Administrator rights I would just arbitarily delete them. Will chase ordinary people away in droves. Surely only relevant to overly-literate geeks!!!jdaw1 wrote:TPF needs some special emoticons. Not “pointlessly flashy epileptic-unfriendly emoticons with a target audience of illiterate teenagers†: I mean useful TPF-relevant emoticons.
Some examples:My thinking is that each colour would come in two versions: “tasting† and “drinking†. This also affords a splendid opportunity for bickering over colours, and their names. (I am unsatisfied with the colours of the examples made: more work needed. But you get the idea.)
- Niepoort 1977, tasting measure;
Niepoort 1977, drinking measure;
Taylor 1994, drinking measure;
Dow 1977, drinking measure.
Sorry, Conky, I’ve failed to understand. All three posts made me laugh.Conky wrote:See how easy it is Julian? Now when you've read this, and understood the insult, please delete this Post, and develop a more 'live and let live' balance.
Sort of Port coloured.jdaw1 wrote:Sorry, Conky, I’ve failed to understand. All three posts made me laugh.Conky wrote:See how easy it is Julian? Now when you've read this, and understood the insult, please delete this Post, and develop a more 'live and let live' balance.
How red is Warre 1980? RGB?
Do we really need 40? That will totally dominate the Emoticons.jdaw1 wrote:OK, I have a set of (now 40) glasses. As soon as I manage to make a .pak file, they will be sent to the creator’s assistant for uploading (I can’t do that myself).
That is fine. Colours are not emotions. I can cope with lots of colours.jdaw1 wrote:The plan is that a TN writer can say “it was <this> colour†. That requires several colours. And the FF6633 isn’t far off the Borges 1963 we had at the TCP on Wed 30 Jan (though the colour was actually nearer FF9900).
No comment on this? I am surprised.jdaw1 wrote:There is an extra icon, which should not be uploaded without suitable permission, that I propose naming “QuotePedant†: . I shan’t be using it, but perhaps others would wish to!
I was intrigued by the exclamation mark at the end of the sentence, which I thought should be a question mark.jdaw1 wrote:No comment on this? I am surprised.jdaw1 wrote:There is an extra icon, which should not be uploaded without suitable permission, that I propose naming “QuotePedant†: . I shan’t be using it, but perhaps others would wish to!
Maybe I could do a question-mark version. Not sure if there’s space. Tomorrow perhaps.Derek T. wrote:I was intrigued by the exclamation mark at the end of the sentence, which I thought should be a question mark.
OK, so now has a pendant, . I don’t like the pendant: it’s too crowded.jdaw1 wrote:Maybe I could do a question-mark version. Not sure if there’s space. Tomorrow perhaps.Derek T. wrote:I was intrigued by the exclamation mark at the end of the sentence, which I thought should be a question mark.
jdaw1 wrote:New emoticons installed. Please do use the colours in your TNs.
Also added:KillerB wrote:jdaw1 wrote:New emoticons installed. Please do use the colours in your TNs.
jdaw1 wrote:Also added:KillerB wrote:jdaw1 wrote:New emoticons installed. Please do use the colours in your TNs.