600 members

Make suggestions and report problems.
Post Reply
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4081
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

600 members

Post by flash_uk »

I see we are now 600 members (assuming some recent additions are not spammers).
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 600 members

Post by jdaw1 »

I had been pondering another purge of members who seem totally uninterested. Defined as:
• Zero posts;
• Registered ≥2 months ago;
• Last visited either never, or shortly after registration, or very long ago;
• Name or email not suggesting a trade person.

Should I re-do that?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 600 members

Post by DRT »

Yes.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14880
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 600 members

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Yes
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3503
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: 600 members

Post by PhilW »

Yes, assuming an "AND" of your criteria (maybe not visible on tapatalk). Perhaps registered > 3 months.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 600 members

Post by DRT »

I think it is "OR".
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 600 members

Post by DRT »

Or perhaps both.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 600 members

Post by jdaw1 »

PhilW wrote:Yes, assuming an "AND" of your criteria
Indeed, AND.
jdaw1 wrote:• Name or email not suggesting a trade person.
Perhaps should be re-rewritten as
• Name/email jointly not suggesting a trade person.
Post Reply