The cost of storing Dow 2001 LBV

Talk about anything but keep it polite and reasonably clean.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

The cost of storing Dow 2001 LBV

Post by jdaw1 »

Moved by jdaw1 in an admin capacity from AHB’s TN entitled 2001 Dows Late Bottled Vintage Port. AHB had proposed storing a bottle of this at Octavian for five years, after which the conversation drifted.

The storage at Octavian, plus in-and-out fees, will probably cost more than the port.
Last edited by jdaw1 on 21:05 Tue 04 Dec 2007, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14900
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: The storage at Octavian … will … cost more than the port

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

jdaw1 wrote:The storage at Octavian, plus in-and-out fees, will probably cost more than the port.
While I agree with the sentiment, the practicality of this is that you will be very unlikely to find the 2001 Dow LBV in 5 years time at any price. For the sake of being able to try a slightly eccentric experiment, I am willing to pay the equivalent of a further £5.83 (at today's prices) to mature a bottle costing £5.49 as part of a mixed case deposited at Octavian for a while.

And if it ends up taking more than 5 years before it comes back out of Octavian, that's no great hardship.

Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: The storage at Octavian … will … cost more than the port

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:The storage at Octavian, plus in-and-out fees, will probably cost more than the port.
Jdaw,

I must point out that this is the kind of ridiculous logic that a woman would use to try to undermine one's hobby.

It is a well known fact that delivery and storage costs do not count when assessing or discussing the cost of owning a port cellar. These are simply unavoidable overheads, in much the same way as a woman would consider the cost of toiletries, cosmetics and clothes. :wink:

Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

You silly man.

Post by jdaw1 »

If one is comparing owning a cellar to not owning a cellar, of course delivery and storage costs don’t count. You silly man—we all know that.

But if one is comparing continued ownership of a bottle to drinking it, these costs then do count and should be considered. You silly man.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: You silly man.

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote: if one is comparing continued ownership of a bottle to drinking it, these costs then do count and should be considered.
No. They never count. Ever. You silly man.

Derek

PS: Please note that women may read this and use it as amunition against us. You are spoiling things for the whole class.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14900
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

In need of a snip

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Would one of the admins be kind enough to snip this thread just after my last tasting note - the remainder to be consigned to meaningless drivel.

Thanks

AHB
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Post by DRT »

Gladly. Jdaw1 has obviously taken us way off topic here with his silly remarks :roll: :roll:

:lol:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

I used my new powers before Derek T. could strike.

Post by jdaw1 »

I used my new powers before Derek T. could strike.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Post by DRT »

Oi!!!

I had the thread in front of me, highlighted the post to split from, chose a new title and destination and wham - I got gazzumped by the new Assistant to the Deputy of the Creator's Assistant :shock:

Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Did new boy fall at the first fence?

Post by jdaw1 »

Did I choose an acceptable split? Was the new title within the usual bounds? Did new boy fall at the first fence?
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: The storage at Octavian … will … cost more than the

Post by RAYC »

AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:The storage at Octavian, plus in-and-out fees, will probably cost more than the port.
While I agree with the sentiment, the practicality of this is that you will be very unlikely to find the 2001 Dow LBV in 5 years time at any price. For the sake of being able to try a slightly eccentric experiment, I am willing to pay the equivalent of a further £5.83 (at today's prices) to mature a bottle costing £5.49 as part of a mixed case deposited at Octavian for a while.

And if it ends up taking more than 5 years before it comes back out of Octavian, that's no great hardship.

Alex

What became of this other bottle of 2001 Dow LBV in the end? Did it go into storage? Or was this TN posted in reference to it....?!
Rob C.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14900
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: The cost of storing Dow 2001 LBV

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I think I still have the bottle; I'll check when I get the chance.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Post Reply