Page 2 of 3

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:19 Mon 11 Aug 2014
by djewesbury
I think it a shame that your decline has begun so early.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:58 Wed 13 Aug 2014
by jdaw1
AHB is currently on 7995. He is about to switch from Taylor 1970 to Graham’s 1970.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 23:00 Wed 13 Aug 2014
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:AHB is currently on 7995. He is about to switch from Taylor 1970 to Graham’s 1970.
Quite right too.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 23:07 Wed 13 Aug 2014
by Alex Bridgeman
djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:AHB is currently on 7995. He is about to switch from Taylor 1970 to Graham’s 1970.
Quite right too.
But when will I reach Taylor 1985? After all, that is currently a more enjoyable wine than Graham... :twisted:

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 23:07 Wed 13 Aug 2014
by djewesbury
AHB wrote:
djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:AHB is currently on 7995. He is about to switch from Taylor 1970 to Graham’s 1970.
Quite right too.
But when will I reach Taylor 1985? After all, that is currently a more enjoyable wine than Graham... :twisted:
Infinite loop created.. Cannot compute..

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 22:45 Sat 16 Aug 2014
by jdaw1
7999 …

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 22:45 Sat 16 Aug 2014
by jdaw1
… became 8001.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 16:14 Tue 19 Aug 2014
by flash_uk
Congratulations Julian, now Fonseca 1966.
Picture1.png
Picture1.png (43.86 KiB) Viewed 20673 times

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 16:15 Tue 19 Aug 2014
by jdaw1
And I just crossed a threshold.

Edit: as you also saw.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 16:29 Mon 01 Sep 2014
by flash_uk
And an interesting ranking for me:
Picture_666.png
Picture_666.png (30.97 KiB) Viewed 20618 times

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 19:00 Tue 02 Sep 2014
by Alex Bridgeman
flash_uk wrote:And an interesting ranking for me:
Picture_666.png
But not one which lasts for long

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 00:07 Wed 03 Sep 2014
by flash_uk
AHB wrote:
flash_uk wrote:And an interesting ranking for me:
Picture_666.png
But not one which lasts for long
Pure luck that I spotted the change!

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:12 Fri 02 Jan 2015
by jdaw1
Image Image

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:33 Fri 02 Jan 2015
by flash_uk
Another milestone :990033: :993333:

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 17:44 Tue 24 Feb 2015
by djewesbury
Ooh! I progressed to Taylor 1970 and I didn't even notice!

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 11:54 Sun 15 Mar 2015
by flash_uk
A neat statistic...

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:42 Sun 07 Jun 2015
by jdaw1
In typing my 1945 TNs I left Croft 1945 and became Taylor 1927. Not too shabby.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 23:08 Wed 09 Dec 2015
by djewesbury
With just another 20 posts I will become Graham 1970.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 23:19 Mon 03 Oct 2016
by jdaw1
I just left the twentieth century: Cockburn 1927 → Taylor 1900.

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 22:49 Tue 23 Jan 2018
by jdaw1
Approaching another transition:
Image

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 22:50 Tue 06 Feb 2018
by jdaw1
Image Image

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 10:49 Wed 07 Feb 2018
by Doggett
jdaw1 wrote: 22:50 Tue 06 Feb 2018
Image Image
A fine landmark indeed!

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:45 Fri 21 May 2021
by jdaw1
The ranks changed since the image above. As Dow 1896 is in, presumably the change happened in response to that question.

Image

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 21:59 Fri 21 May 2021
by JacobH
I’m curious that after the unfiltered LBVs (Noval, Niepoort & Warre) we have three rather average tawnies (Graham’s “The Tawny”, Warre 10 Otima & Cruz Tawny). Did someone let Glenn tinker with the list?

Re: Cruz Ruby Revisited

Posted: 22:00 Fri 21 May 2021
by jdaw1
For all its many imperfections, my vote is to deem it sanctified by antiquity.