A minor diversion

Talk about anything but keep it polite and reasonably clean.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: A minor diversion

Post by Glenn E. »

RAYC wrote:
PhilW wrote:A good show! Am slightly unsure on the sigma notation validity?
I would normally have expected limits above and below, such as
4*2
∑(n) +3
n=1

although this needs additional algebra letters, which is perhaps borderline on being allowed...
If ∑(1..4*2) is acceptable to mean the sum of the list of numbers represented then I would have to allow it.

I'll share my alternatives:
34 = 4! +3^2 +1
39 = (3!)^2 +4 -1

Use of factorial makes at least 1-52 possible, not sure how much higher.
Not to say that these aren't impressive, but summation and factorial operators are short-form definitions for much longer calculations (at least according to my very shaky understanding). So if square and square roots symbols can't be used without counting those as use of the number 2, i'm not convinced that these formulas can be used without counting all the numbers they involve when set out in long form!
Yes, but Phil already ruled that √n, which is itself the short form of 2√n, is valid. 4! does in fact represent 4*3*2*1 but it is a standard mathematical operator (symbol) and therefore should be allowed. As ruled, you must count the use of a digit if it is visible in the notation, thus making 4! a valid way to use the digit 4 and only the digit 4.

My concern with ∑ was that it might not be considered a standard mathematical symbol because it is a Greek letter. However Phil has reminded me that its standard use does involve further algebraic notation so I don't think it should be valid. Then again, due to the prevalence of spreadsheets it might be that ∑(1..4*2) is now valid notation, so I really don't know.
Glenn Elliott
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: A minor diversion

Post by Glenn E. »

This also begs the question, what is the largest number you can represent using standard mathematical notation and the digits 1, 2, 3, and 4 under the same rules that Phil has laid out?

2^3!^(4+1)! = 64^120 = 5.515652e216

or better yet...

3!^((4*(2+1))!) = 6^479001600 which causes my calculator to give up and simply respond with ∞.
Glenn Elliott
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3503
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: A minor diversion

Post by PhilW »

Glenn E. wrote:This also begs the question, what is the largest number you can represent using standard mathematical notation and the digits 1, 2, 3, and 4 under the same rules that Phil has laid out?

2^3!^(4+1)! = 64^120 = 5.515652e216

or better yet...

3!^((4*(2+1))!) = 6^479001600 which causes my calculator to give up and simply respond with ∞.
I don't think there is a limit; you could keep on adding more brackets and factorial signs:
((((((2^(3^(4+1)))!)!)!)!)!)! etc
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: A minor diversion

Post by Glenn E. »

PhilW wrote:I don't think there is a limit; you could keep on adding more brackets and factorial signs
Hmm... good point. So I guess it's not a very interesting question.
Glenn Elliott
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3028
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: A minor diversion

Post by Andy Velebil »

Oh my, that's a lot of numbers, good thing it's #PortDay. I think I'll start drinking a little early...Like now :lol: :lol:
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: A minor diversion

Post by jdaw1 »

Just remembered this thread. I can do 1 to 84, except 76.

1 = ((1^3)^(4/2))
2 = ((1+2)+(3-4))
3 = ((1*2)-(3-4))
4 = ((1+2)-(3-4))
5 = ((1*3)-(2-4))
6 = ((1-2)+(3+4))
7 = ((1^2)*(3+4))
8 = ((1^2)+(3+4))
9 = ((1*2)+(3+4))
10 = ((1+2)+(3+4))
11 = ((1-2)+(3*4))
12 = ((1^2)*(3*4))
13 = ((1^2)+(3*4))
14 = ((1*2)+(3*4))
15 = ((1+2)+(3*4))
16 = ((1^3)*(2^4))
17 = ((1^3)+(2^4))
18 = ((1*3)*(2+4))
19 = ((1*3)+(2^4))
20 = ((1+3)+(2^4))
21 = ((1+2)*(3+4))
22 = (2*((3*4)-1))
23 = ((2*(3*4))-1)
24 = ((1*2)*(3*4))
25 = ((1+4)*(2+3))
26 = ((1+(3*4))*2)
27 = ((3^2)*(4-1))
28 = ((1+(2*3))*4)
29 = ((2^(1+4))-3)
30 = ((1+4)*(2*3))
31 = ((3^(1+2))+4)
32 = ((1/2)*(4^3))
33 = ((4*(2^3))+1)
34 = ((1+(4!))+(3^2))
35 = ((2^(1+4))+3)
36 = ((1+2)*(3*4))
37 = ((4*(3^2))+1)
38 = ((2^(1+4))+(3!))
39 = (((3!)^2)-(1-4))
40 = ((1+4)*(2^3))
41 = ((1+(3^4))/2)
42 = ((1*2)*((4!)-3))
43 = ((2*((4!)-1))-3)
44 = ((1-3)*(2-(4!)))
45 = ((1+4)*(3^2))
46 = ((1-3)+(2*(4!)))
47 = ((3*(2^4))-1)
48 = ((1*3)*(2^4))
49 = ((3+4)^(1*2))
50 = (1+((3+4)^2))
51 = ((1+(2^4))*3)
52 = ((1+3)+(2*(4!)))
53 = ((2*(1+(4!)))+3)
54 = ((3^(4-1))*2)
55 = ((2*(3+(4!)))+1)
56 = ((1+(3!))*(2*4))
57 = (4+1)!/2-3
58 = ((4^(1+2))-(3!))
59 = ((2^(3!))-(1+4))
60 = ((1+4)*(2*(3!)))
61 = ((4^3)-(1+2))
62 = ((4^3)-(1*2))
63 = ((1-2)+(4^3))
64 = ((1^2)*(4^3))
65 = ((1^2)+(4^3))
66 = ((1*2)+(4^3))
67 = ((1+2)+(4^3))
68 = ((1*4)+(2^(3!)))
69 = ((1+4)+(2^(3!)))
70 = ((3*(4!))-(1*2))
71 = ((1-2)+(3*(4!)))
72 = ((1+2)*((3!)*4))
73 = ((1^2)+(3*(4!)))
74 = ((1*2)+(3*(4!)))
75 = (3*((1+4)^2))
76 = ?
77 = ((3*(1+(4!)))+2)
78 = ((3^4)-(1+2))
79 = ((3^4)-(1*2))
80 = ((1-2)+(3^4))
81 = ((1^2)*(3^4))
82 = ((1^2)+(3^4))
83 = ((1*2)+(3^4))
84 = ((1+2)+(3^4))
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3503
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: A minor diversion

Post by PhilW »

jdaw1 wrote:Just remembered this thread. I can do 1 to 84, except 76.
Well played. My only solution for 76 would be
76 = (∑(1..(3*4)))-2
provided that such use of ∑(1..n) is valid to mean the sum of values 1 to n without the full algebraic form required. Without the ∑ I do not have a solution for 76 either.
Post Reply