Page 1 of 1

Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 15:32 Sun 20 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
This thread is to hold examples of Daniel admitting that he was wrong.

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 16:54 Sun 20 Sep 2015
by djewesbury

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 15:08 Thu 24 Sep 2015
by DRT
A few minutes ago by text, Daniel wrote:
Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 15.04.14.png
Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 15.04.14.png (14.79 KiB) Viewed 6471 times

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 15:13 Thu 24 Sep 2015
by djewesbury
In a private communication. A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION. That's it. Your dinner's in the dog and your dog's in the canal.

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 08:57 Fri 25 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=95355#95355]Here[/url] djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Obviously, if I were wrong, I would be very eager to say so.
Degree versus masculine ordinal: go on, say.
I was wrong.
Well, the greatest of my hat-trick: IVDP and large bottles; Davy’s and The Bung Hole; and now, supreme and unexpected victory, Daniel “eager to say” that he was wrong, and actually does so—even if somewhat hiding the light under a bushel.

I really did not expect to be making a second post in this thread.

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 11:45 Fri 25 Sep 2015
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=95355#95355]Here[/url] djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Obviously, if I were wrong, I would be very eager to say so.
Degree versus masculine ordinal: go on, say.
I was wrong.
Well, the greatest of my hat-trick: IVDP and large bottles; Davy’s and The Bung Hole; and now, supreme and unexpected victory, Daniel “eager to say” that he was wrong, and actually does so—even if somewhat hiding the light under a bushel.

I really did not expect to be making a second post in this thread.
A shame that it's only really visible in Tapatalk.

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 11:47 Fri 25 Sep 2015
by djewesbury
I feel I should say, at this point, that the lack of faith in my common decency has genuinely shocked me. Genuinely. I'm terribly upset and I need to go and lie down.

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Posted: 23:04 Sat 26 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
djewesbury wrote:A shame that it's only really visible in Tapatalk.
Its invisibility so re-affirmed that which it attempted to deny. Whether or not Freudian, beautiful.