Daniel not being Daniel

Talk about anything but keep it polite and reasonably clean.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19826
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Daniel not being Daniel

Post by jdaw1 » 15:32 Sun 20 Sep 2015

This thread is to hold examples of Daniel admitting that he was wrong.

User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8153
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by djewesbury » 16:54 Sun 20 Sep 2015

Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15024
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by DRT » 15:08 Thu 24 Sep 2015

A few minutes ago by text, Daniel wrote:
Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 15.04.14.png
Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 15.04.14.png (14.79 KiB) Viewed 1356 times
"The first duty of Port is to be red"

Ernest H. Cockburn

User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8153
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by djewesbury » 15:13 Thu 24 Sep 2015

In a private communication. A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION. That's it. Your dinner's in the dog and your dog's in the canal.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19826
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by jdaw1 » 08:57 Fri 25 Sep 2015

[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=95355#95355]Here[/url] djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Obviously, if I were wrong, I would be very eager to say so.
Degree versus masculine ordinal: go on, say.
I was wrong.
Well, the greatest of my hat-trick: IVDP and large bottles; Davy’s and The Bung Hole; and now, supreme and unexpected victory, Daniel “eager to say” that he was wrong, and actually does so—even if somewhat hiding the light under a bushel.

I really did not expect to be making a second post in this thread.

User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8153
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by djewesbury » 11:45 Fri 25 Sep 2015

jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=95355#95355]Here[/url] djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Obviously, if I were wrong, I would be very eager to say so.
Degree versus masculine ordinal: go on, say.
I was wrong.
Well, the greatest of my hat-trick: IVDP and large bottles; Davy’s and The Bung Hole; and now, supreme and unexpected victory, Daniel “eager to say” that he was wrong, and actually does so—even if somewhat hiding the light under a bushel.

I really did not expect to be making a second post in this thread.
A shame that it's only really visible in Tapatalk.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8153
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by djewesbury » 11:47 Fri 25 Sep 2015

I feel I should say, at this point, that the lack of faith in my common decency has genuinely shocked me. Genuinely. I'm terribly upset and I need to go and lie down.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19826
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Daniel not being Daniel

Post by jdaw1 » 23:04 Sat 26 Sep 2015

djewesbury wrote:A shame that it's only really visible in Tapatalk.
Its invisibility so re-affirmed that which it attempted to deny. Whether or not Freudian, beautiful.

Post Reply