2004 Pol Roger

Anything but Port, this includes all wines other than fortified wines (which have their own section) even if they call themselves Port. There is a search facility for this part of the forum.
Forum rules
Anything but Port, this includes all non-Port fortified wines even if they call themselves Port. There is a search facility for this part of the forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14908
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

2004 Pol Roger

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Pale lemon yellow colour. Intense on the nose, full of brioche and lemon. Concentrated and dense on the palate with much of the intensity of a serious white wine. Long finish of good intensity. However, this lacks the freshness and balance I look for in a Champage - I preferred the NV shown alongside. 86/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by djewesbury »

AHB wrote:Pale lemon yellow colour.
Like a Riesling then? Lovely!
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by LGTrotter »

Thank you for this. Telling that you preferred the NV. I think I might stick with what I've got and maybe get a few NV from one of the Christmas offers. I see Berrys has got one for Pol. I was rather more enthused by Nichols and Perks Bolly offer, which will almost certainly be over by the time I decide. Procrastination has saved me a fortune.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by LGTrotter »

On reflection I recall that the 98 champagnes were widely twitted and for much the same reasons you describe. They became cheap by comparison to the 96s and have proved, for the most part, to be as good as the 96s. The only solution is to try one for myself.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by LGTrotter »

djewesbury wrote:
AHB wrote:Pale lemon yellow colour.
Like a Riesling then? Lovely!
Without the taste of petrol, so sought after by aficionados and readily found on most forecourts.
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 20:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by AW77 »

LGTrotter wrote:
djewesbury wrote:
AHB wrote:Pale lemon yellow colour.
Like a Riesling then? Lovely!
Without the taste of petrol, so sought after by aficionados and readily found on most forecourts.
Owen, I really hope that one day you will taste the petrol notes for yourself. It will surely be your Damascene moment.
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by djewesbury »

Owen tastes the petrol notes every night, I think he's given that much away. It costs him 123.9p a litre.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by LGTrotter »

AW77 wrote:Owen, I really hope that one day you will taste the petrol notes for yourself. It will surely be your Damascene moment.
djewesbury wrote:Owen tastes the petrol notes every night, I think he's given that much away. It costs him 123.9p a litre.
It doesn't taste the same since they took the lead out of it. I'm ageing mine in old bourbon barrels to smooth it out. Hello Glenn, I didn't see you there!
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by LGTrotter »

Had a bottle this evening, Emma was very damming, giving it a similar tasting note to Alex has (hence my decision not to put it as a separate tasting note), she too said she preferred the NV and that the nose was OK but the palate was lumpy. And I agree with her. And Alex.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by djewesbury »

Had a lovely half of the NV this evening. Delicious.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3032
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by Andy Velebil »

Was this the regular, the Reserve, or the Sir Winston Churchill version?
User avatar
WS1
Cruz 1989
Posts: 1058
Joined: 23:08 Wed 04 Feb 2009
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: 2004 Pol Roger

Post by WS1 »

DrDirk and me just having the Pol Roger 04 as an apperitive before comparing/enjoying other chmpagnes. Very disappointing for a vintage Pol! Too light, meager and short in the finish. Not sure if it will improve. :roll: I hope it does since I bought Mags from this as well..... :evil: :oops:
"Sometimes too much to drink is barely enough"
Mark Twain
Post Reply