2005 Cloudy Bay Chardonnay

Anything but Port, this includes all wines other than fortified wines (which have their own section) even if they call themselves Port. There is a search facility for this part of the forum.
Forum rules
Anything but Port, this includes all non-Port fortified wines even if they call themselves Port. There is a search facility for this part of the forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

2005 Cloudy Bay Chardonnay

Post by KillerB »

First time that I've tried the 2005, it must be new stock.

Nice light colour. Nose of honey, nice mouth-feel but a little light and classic flavours of honey and lemon. I tend to find that the CB Chards gain a bit of depth with a year or two in the bottle. I've got a 2004 left so that will probably be taken next. Nice with the roast chicken though.
Port is basically a red drink
Conky
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1770
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007

Post by Conky »

Alex,

Am I right in thinking that such wine can appear in the same year? Unlike the two years needed for Port.
You recommended Cloudy Bay to me a while ago, and at £20 a bottle, I'm shamelessly waiting to see it on offer.
What would be a generally accepted 'good year' if ever I'm lucky enough to have a choice?
Are you still of the opinion its a very good entry level Chardonnay?
(I think thats enough questions for now :D )

Alan
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

It's the Sauvignon Blanc that appears in the same year and should be drunk pretty fresh, normally during the following Summer, so I'm getting through 2006 SBs now.

The Chard is generally better a year or so after release, so the 2005 has been released but the 2004 is better now.

Yes, it is a very good Chard, wouldn't quite call it entry-level - a bit above.
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I'll throw in a note of caution though. I opened one of the Cloudy Bay 2005 Chardonnays that I picked up from Majestic over the weekend. Opened purely for Elizabeth (I had my Tesco 1994 VP) and she was singularly unimpressed by it, saying that it was "too woody" to be enjoyable. She did note that the following day it was a little better.

But I drink so little white wine that I can't really recommend an alternative as an entry level Chardonnay.

Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

Whilst it is an oaked Chardonnay, I certainly wouldn't consider it overly woody. I also stick by my recommendation to shove it in the cellar for a year or two. It's good stuff and worthy of aging.
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I can certainly appreciate that it might mellow and improve with some cellar age, I thought I'd throw in an interesting twist on the story.

I'm currently reading a few back issues of The World of Fine Wine magazine. In the summer 2004 issue there's a great article about screw tops as an alternative closure to corks. The article reviews a number of scre top wines that were tasted against cork stoppered wines and comes to the conclusion that the screw tops of that time were more prone to allowing bottle variation and over-reduction in the wines compared to the cork stoppered bottles.

Its a shame I only have one bottle of the 2005 Cloudy Bay Chardonnay left or I could have carried out my own comparative tasting.

I should also add that the one that we opened at the weekend did not show any signs at all of any flaws that I could notice.

Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

Oh, I wouldn't expect it to have a fault of 'woodiness', it's not one that accompanies TCA and Brett. It does change profile quite a lot dependent upon temperature but I would expect the woodiness to be at higher temperatures and I'm sure you chilled it a little.

Differences in taste, that's all.
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Post by uncle tom »

Last May I pitched Cloudy Bay's SB against the Chy with a few friends - both 2002 -

Consensus was - SB, really good - Chardonnay, utter rubbish - a huge contrast - (two bottles of each were opened)

Tom
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

Interesting, I've always liked the Chard but not sure I've had the 2002. I remember that the SB was very good though.
Port is basically a red drink
Post Reply