Page 2 of 5

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 13:38 Fri 14 Feb 2014
by jdaw1
Updated draft of the placemats.(Mike: right- and left-handers have slightly different pages, which is why the question was asked.)

Image Image Image

(This post edited Fri 07 Mar to show second page of glasses.)

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 12:48 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by flash_uk
So everyone coming to this session is right-handed. Using Tommy Cooper-think, if a couple more people sign up, one of them will be left-handed.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 12:59 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by jdaw1
flash_uk wrote:Using Tommy Cooper-think
‟And there are five people in my family, so it must be one of them”?

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 13:49 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by flash_uk
Exactly!

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 22:25 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by jdaw1
PopulusTremula wrote:Confirmed:
  1. Populus Tremula;
  2. JDAW;
  3. DRT;
  4. WS1;
  5. CPR 1;
  6. AHB;
  7. DJ;
  8. MPM.
I’ve just notice that we are eight people, for whom a mere six bottles will be a woefully inadequate bagatelle. What should be done about this?

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 23:13 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:I’ve just notice that we are eight people, for whom a mere six bottles will be a woefully inadequate bagatelle. What should be done about this?
Beer.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 23:18 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by flash_uk
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:I’ve just notice that we are eight people, for whom a mere six bottles will be a woefully inadequate bagatelle. What should be done about this?
Beer.
More port

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 23:24 Sat 15 Feb 2014
by jdaw1
flash_uk wrote:
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:I’ve just notice that we are eight people, for whom a mere six bottles will be a woefully inadequate bagatelle. What should be done about this?
Beer.
More port
Both.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 00:38 Sun 16 Feb 2014
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:
flash_uk wrote:
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:I’ve just notice that we are eight people, for whom a mere six bottles will be a woefully inadequate bagatelle. What should be done about this?
Beer.
More port
Both.
Life is all about compromises, so I agree to both.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 23:18 Wed 05 Mar 2014
by flash_uk
PopulusTremula wrote:As only six bottles are included in the case study, depending on the number of attendees and our degree of thirst, we can supplement the six with additional bottles of other wines if required.
Would it be an idea to constrain additional bottles to be only horizontal or vertical from G80?

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 08:20 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by PopulusTremula
Lets not do any additional G80 as one of the objectives is to assess intra-case variability. Although another G80 could be said to represent an outside reference for the same wine, thus contributing to objectives 2 and 3, let's limit this wine to the six siblings from the case.

Bringing of other wines is very much encouraged however. These can be blind or sighted, my preference being the former. DRT's Malvedos '76 on 26 Feb is a case in point; collective headscratching and incorrect guesses ensued.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk 2

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 09:26 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by flash_uk
My suggestion was perhaps a bit vague I realise now! I was definitely not thinking more G80, but rather for additions either have more G, like a 77 or 83, offering an opportunity to compare and contrast a little older and a little younger to the case of 6, or, have more 80s which are not G, to offer a reference point to the same vintage. All serving to help with objectives 2 and 3. Could still do this blind.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 09:53 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by PopulusTremula
flash_uk wrote:My suggestion was perhaps a bit vague I realise now! I was definitely not thinking more G80, but rather for additions either have more G, like a 77 or 83, offering an opportunity to compare and contrast a little older and a little younger to the case of 6, or, have more 80s which are not G, to offer a reference point to the same vintage. All serving to help with objectives 2 and 3. Could still do this blind.
Re-reading your post, no vagueness was found. My initial befuddlement is blamed on the early hour combined with standing room only on a Southeastern train.

Your suggestion is wholly endorsed, feel free to bring non-80 Grahams or other 80s. Let's keep these blind if possible.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 11:06 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by jdaw1
OK, bye bye ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ placemat theme.

Who is bringing extras? I have none to hand matching the specification, but could adopt. Or maybe there could be general split adoption, in effect adding half a bottle per person.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 13:11 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by CPR 1
I have a selection of bottles that meet the criteria and am happy to bring one blind if that helps the evening along.....

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 15:30 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by flash_uk
I also have one that would fit the bill.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 17:50 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by flash_uk
jdaw1 wrote:OK, bye bye ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ placemat theme.
:( That seems a shame. Could we not retain this placemat for the case of 6 and supplement with another for whatever extras arrive?

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 22:16 Thu 06 Mar 2014
by PhilW
flash_uk wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:OK, bye bye ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ placemat theme.
:( That seems a shame. Could we not retain this placemat for the case of 6 and supplement with another for whatever extras arrive?
Perhaps the next 6 could show the possible moves for each piece using a series of checked squares within each circle?

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 08:16 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by PopulusTremula
CPR 1 wrote:I have a selection of bottles that meet the criteria and am happy to bring one blind if that helps the evening along.....
That is most appreciated. Please bring. We'll do the two emergency flares blind.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk 2

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 08:22 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by PopulusTremula
flash_uk wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:OK, bye bye ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ placemat theme.
:( That seems a shame. Could we not retain this placemat for the case of 6 and supplement with another for whatever extras arrive?
I agree, the theme should remain, too good to skip. Would it be possible to create black versions of the pawn and knight for the two wines brought blind by CPR and flash?

Magnus

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk 2

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 08:23 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by PopulusTremula
flash_uk wrote:I also have one that would fit the bill.
Flash: thanks for offering to bring an extra. Offer hereby gratefully accepted. Please bring blind.

Magnus

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk 2

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 09:25 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by flash_uk
PopulusTremula wrote:
flash_uk wrote:I also have one that would fit the bill.
Flash: thanks for offering to bring an extra. Offer hereby gratefully accepted. Please bring blind.

Magnus
will do.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 10:40 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by jdaw1
flash_uk wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:OK, bye bye ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ placemat theme.
:( That seems a shame. Could we not retain this placemat for the case of 6 and supplement with another for whatever extras arrive?
No. The theme can be used another time, when we have exactly six Ports.

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 15:58 Fri 07 Mar 2014
by jdaw1
Updated draft of the placemats.
  • Greeks instead of chess pieces;
  • +Ports names after MPM and CPR.
Image Image Image

Re: Graham 1980 case study - Wednesday 2nd April 2014

Posted: 20:30 Mon 10 Mar 2014
by Alex Bridgeman
I have port which meets the criteria for additional port. I am unclear whether I should bring a bottle. Could someone clarify for me whether this is required?