2004 Fonseca Quinta do Panascal SQVP

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
JacobH
Dow 1980
Posts: 2647
Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
Location: London, UK
Contact:

2004 Fonseca Quinta do Panascal SQVP

Post by JacobH » 22:42 Sun 06 Dec 2020

A bit more burnt red than purple in the middle than the Vargellas ’04. Fading a little to the edge. More youthful on the nose: concentrated fruits (cherries and maybe blackcurrants). In the mouth, rounded fruits; very gentle tannins and good acidity. The fruit structure is more attractive to me than the Vargellas ’04 at the moment, although the after-taste is a bit more tannin-driven. If I had to choose between the two of them I would go for this one.

Tasted at: David Guimaraens: Taylor’s and Fonseca Ports Virtual Tasting

Date: 6th November 2020

Rated*: P+

http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... _2004_SQVP

* A Note on Ratings

My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.
Image

Post Reply