2017 Fonseca

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
JacobH
Dow 1980
Posts: 2653
Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
Location: London, UK
Contact:

2017 Fonseca

Post by JacobH » 22:42 Sun 06 Dec 2020

Deep purple, fading only slightly. The nose is quite elegant: not very grapy, with rounded fruits. In the mouth, immediately sweet. Again, rounded fruits: black cherries, perhaps. The tannins are there but are supportive rather assertive. The acidity is not pronounced. There is a dryness to the finish but I think this more tannin-driven. Of the two ’17s, I preferred the Taylor: this is just a little to shy at the moment for my tastes.

Tasted at: David Guimaraens: Taylor’s and Fonseca Ports Virtual Tasting

Date: 6th November 2020

Rated*: P+

http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... ca_2017_VP

* A Note on Ratings

My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.
Image

Post Reply