1985 Fonseca

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4096
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

1985 Fonseca

Post by flash_uk »

We gathered to see how the ports of five major houses from the early 80s were faring.

Links:
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4096
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1985 Fonseca

Post by flash_uk »

65% opacity, dark red, cloudy. Red fruit on the nose. Great structure, tannic, red fruits, a little more mature than I usually associate with F85. Very nice all round though.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14908
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1985 Fonseca

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Part of a parcel sourced from Seckfords. Surprisingly mature appearance (at least compared with recent experience of this wine); 85% opaque. Little showing on the surprisingly hollow nose but the entry onto the palate is wonderful with sweet fruit and redcurrant jelly. The mid-palate is a real delight with so many layers of flavour. There is a touch of heat on the aftertaste before a lovely round, fruit-led finish of sweetened redcurrant takes over. This is a very long and very concentrated port. 92/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23632
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Fonseca

Post by jdaw1 »

F85. Red, 50% opaque. Palate big and soft, but quite dry especially mid-palate. Red fruited, very long, and lovely.
Post Reply