1985 Dow

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4093
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

1985 Dow

Post by flash_uk »

We gathered to see how the ports of five major houses from the early 80s were faring.

Links:
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4093
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1985 Dow

Post by flash_uk »

65% opacity, warm red. Red fruits on the nose. Sweetness, dry, tannic. Ripe red fruit.very nice!
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14900
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1985 Dow

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Deep red colour, very slightly cloudy so the opacity was difficult to judge. Little showed on the nose but the port had a nice balance on entry with dry fruit that managed to be both flavoursome and floral. The lovely floral tones show well on the late palate and combine with delicious young red fruit salad. Rather lively aftertaste with black wine gums before a licorice root finish. Overall this port has a very fine late palate and a great finish but is disappointing on the nose. 88/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Dow

Post by jdaw1 »

D85. Red-purple, 50% opaque. Nose of black Maynard’s wine gums. Palate sweet and rich, with Bassett’s black jelly babies.

Typing this some 2⅓ years after the event, I like the TN. No idea how nonsensically pretentious — other to judge — but I like.
Post Reply