so the bottles were empty? =)jdaw1 wrote:jdaw1 wrote:I have been sent a lot of large pictures. PM me if you want to be sent those of a particular bottle.
vintage port
Re: vintage port
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: vintage port
the bottles are all unopened and original
Re: vintage port
so where do i go to get the bottles of port varified and valued, thanks.
Re: vintage port
As you live in Rochester I would suggest you take them to Dickens House Wine Emporium and ask them for a valuation and to make you an offer. They seem to have a reasonable selection of Port and fine wines so should know what they are doing.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
Having done some previous research that Selo is post very early 1970's.JB vintage wrote:Fake alert!
Hello everyone! Please take care if you are interested in buying the Constantino 1927. The seal is from the 1990's and is not a seal for Constantino 1927.
This is a Colheita, as are most old constantino's.
It is probably real, as best I can tell from the pics, but the story of being given it that long ago is impossible.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
FYI, Constantino (Quinta do Crasto) used to have a lodge in Gaia back in the old days. So this could have been bottled there.DRT wrote:I think that style of selo came into use in the 1970's, which is consistent with the story. As far as I am aware all 1927s would have had no selo when originally released as (a) they would almost all have been bottled outside Gaia and (b) the selo didn't come into use until after the IVP was created in 1931. It is highly likely that a number of bottles were released from the Constantino cellars when the brand was acquired by Ferreira.
I think this bottle is not a fake.
But you are correct that Ferreira has owned it since 1963(ish). It is a Colheita which was probably released after Ferreira bought it. When it was actually bottled may be a different story.
Re: vintage port
Andy,
The point I was making is that when the 1927s were originally bottled (in 1929) they could not have had selos as selos were not yet in use.
Why do you think this is a colheita?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The point I was making is that when the 1927s were originally bottled (in 1929) they could not have had selos as selos were not yet in use.
Why do you think this is a colheita?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
The reason I say it's a Colheita has nothing to do with the Selo. The label and bottle are consistent with what was used to bottle their tawny Ports. It is also consistent with all the other Colheita's I've had from this label. The only old VP bottles I've seen or drank from did not use this molded bottle design and label. That said, I've only seen a few bottles of very old VP from this house as they are exceedingly rare (and as mentioned a different type bottle/label from what i've experienced).DRT wrote:Andy,
The point I was making is that when the 1927s were originally bottled (in 1929) they could not have had selos as selos were not yet in use.
Why do you think this is a colheita?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The label is not an original Constantino label. Actually, this label gives me real pause. The type set used for the word "Vintage" is incorrect for pre-owned Ferreira. Only on later Ferreira owned labels I've seen spelled out the words Sociedade dos Vinhos do Porto. Even the label I have from a 1910 Colheita bottled in 1971 doesn't have this. So I suspect this was a label used post (at least) 1971. Ferreira also released a lot of old Constantino tawny stocks circa late 1960's - 1970's.
For these reasons it appears to me to be a Colheita.
Again, the story of being given this in the 40's or 50's is impossible given the Selo alone. Add in the label design and it's completely impossible.
Re: vintage port
Another picture of the Cn27’s selo and bottle.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
That typeface is Univers, which was designed in 1954 and released in 1957, if that's of any use.Andy Velebil wrote:The type set used for the word "Vintage" is incorrect for pre-owned Ferreira.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
Thank you for the info. However Constantino used a very unique design for their lettering / labels.djewesbury wrote:That typeface is Univers, which was designed in 1954 and released in 1957, if that's of any use.Andy Velebil wrote:The type set used for the word "Vintage" is incorrect for pre-owned Ferreira.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
Exactly. If we consult Phil W's VP identification gallery we find this image:Andy Velebil wrote:Thank you for the info. However Constantino used a very unique design for their lettering / labels.djewesbury wrote:That typeface is Univers, which was designed in 1954 and released in 1957, if that's of any use.Andy Velebil wrote:The type set used for the word "Vintage" is incorrect for pre-owned Ferreira.
This is a 66 - so post-Ferreira. But the typeface for the word 'Vintage' is entirely different from that used on the "27".
We have established it has a selo that was put on many years after 1929.
We have established that it uses a typeface that wasn't available until 1957, at which point Constantino labels presumably used a version of the 'handwritten' label archived by Phil here.
We have established that after 1963ish, the typeface used on the label (for that word VINTAGE, and the date) was that seen above.
So, what have we established?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: vintage port
that I saw this bottle hammer fro 300$ USD if the OP was wondering any indication of worth
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: vintage port
Which bottle? We don't yet know what this bottle is!!g-man wrote:that I saw this bottle hammer fro 300$ USD if the OP was wondering any indication of worth
Rob C.
Re: vintage port
the selo'd one with a similar looking label =)RAYC wrote:Which bottle? We don't yet know what this bottle is!!g-man wrote:that I saw this bottle hammer fro 300$ USD if the OP was wondering any indication of worth
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
-
- Quinta do Noval LBV
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 09:18 Fri 17 May 2013
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
It looks that we have established that this bottle is not authentic, and that there are several things that are not correct on this one. If is good to be able to spot a faulty bottle and I have learned several new things during this discussion.
If the bottle g-man saw in the US was similar, perhaps that was a fake too?
djewesbury- you say that the typeface is Univers and thus post 57. Just out of curiosity, are you referring to the typeface on the bottle or the word Vintage on the label? Or are they the same?
I did find a label of 1947 when googling this and the design of the label is different http://www.port-blog.com/.a/6a00d8341cc ... 0e6970c-pi I hope you do not mind showing the link here Axel.
If the bottle g-man saw in the US was similar, perhaps that was a fake too?
djewesbury- you say that the typeface is Univers and thus post 57. Just out of curiosity, are you referring to the typeface on the bottle or the word Vintage on the label? Or are they the same?
I did find a label of 1947 when googling this and the design of the label is different http://www.port-blog.com/.a/6a00d8341cc ... 0e6970c-pi I hope you do not mind showing the link here Axel.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
That is NOT TRUE. This bottle may very well be and probably is authentic. I see nothing that makes it a forgery at this point in time.JB vintage wrote:It looks that we have established that this bottle is not authentic, and that there are several things that are not correct on this one.
However, it was originally released after the Contstantino brand was sold to Ferreira.
Most likely this is a tawny Port.
What is not correct is the story of being given it back in the 1940's - 50's. As that would be impossible given the label and Selo strip design.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
vintage port
I think we need further information before we can be conclusive on that but it is certainly anomalous..JB vintage wrote:It looks that we have established that this bottle is not authentic, and that there are several things that are not correct on this one.
Just to the word 'Vintage' and the date, 1927, below it. The bottle seems genuine enough - surely a very complex and costly thing to fake! If nobody has seen any other Constantinos that use this typeface - and it is surely possible that a mislabelled Colheita was bottled many years later, and that the typeface used on this bottling was not the same as that used in other post-Ferreira labels - then it still is not enough to say that this is a fake, necessarily, even with the added information of the selo.JB vintage wrote:djewesbury- you say that the typeface is Univers and thus post 57. Just out of curiosity, are you referring to the typeface on the bottle or the word Vintage on the label? Or are they the same?
This is a 41 - but the label is the same design as the 47 I posted above I think.JB vintage wrote:I did find a label of 1947 when googling this and the design of the label is different http://www.port-blog.com/.a/6a00d8341cc ... 0e6970c-pi I hope you do not mind showing the link here Axel.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
The hard part is often times, as we know, when a Tawny Port is sold in different countries different wording was often used on the label. Think of Graham's "Single Harvest" on the label for their new Tawny's instead of using the term "Colheita". So it is possible this was a tawny sold somewhere where the term "Colheita" would not have been accepted (like the UK, who is adverse to the term) and the simple term vintage was used instead.djewesbury wrote:.....and it is surely possible that a mislabelled Colheita was bottled many years later...
That is all speculation on our part. Heck it very well may be a ruby port for all we know. I will reach out and see if I can get a definitive answer on this.
Re: vintage port
Andy Velebil wrote:The hard part is often times, as we know, when a Tawny Port is sold in different countries different wording was often used on the label. Think of Graham's "Single Harvest" on the label for their new Tawny's instead of using the term "Colheita". So it is possible this was a tawny sold somewhere where the term "Colheita" would not have been accepted (like the UK, who is adverse to the term) and the simple term vintage was used instead.djewesbury wrote:.....and it is surely possible that a mislabelled Colheita was bottled many years later...
That is all speculation on our part. Heck it very well may be a ruby port for all we know. I will reach out and see if I can get a definitive answer on this.
with a date on it?
i thought by ivdp rules it's illegal to put a date on a ruby. (or did you mean lbv?)
but constantino isn't a label that comes to mind as something that should be faked due to the fact it does't realy sell for a premium compared to other labels
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
Don't follow you as to the "date on it" comment??g-man wrote:
with a date on it?
i thought by ivdp rules it's illegal to put a date on a ruby. (or did you mean lbv?)
but constantino isn't a label that comes to mind as something that should be faked due to the fact it does't realy sell for a premium compared to other labels
Re: vintage port
Andy Velebil wrote:Don't follow you as to the "date on it" comment??g-man wrote:
with a date on it?
i thought by ivdp rules it's illegal to put a date on a ruby. (or did you mean lbv?)
but constantino isn't a label that comes to mind as something that should be faked due to the fact it does't realy sell for a premium compared to other labels
i think the ivdp rules state that if it's marked Ruby
you're not allowed to have a date like 1927 on it
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: vintage port
Well all vp is a Ruby and it has a date.g-man wrote:Andy Velebil wrote:Don't follow you as to the "date on it" comment??g-man wrote:
with a date on it?
i thought by ivdp rules it's illegal to put a date on a ruby. (or did you mean lbv?)
but constantino isn't a label that comes to mind as something that should be faked due to the fact it does't realy sell for a premium compared to other labels
i think the ivdp rules state that if it's marked Ruby
you're not allowed to have a date like 1927 on it
Re: vintage port
There is no point trying to retrospectively apply today's IVDP rules to labels that were produced decades ago.g-man wrote:i think the ivdp rules state that if it's marked Ruby
you're not allowed to have a date like 1927 on it
Personally, I think there is insufficient evidence for anyone to make a definitive claim that this bottle is anything other than what the seller claims it to be. I think the bottle looks genuine, the label looks genuine, it is probably vintage port (not a colheita) and is an ex-cellar release which is why it has a selo over the top of the capsule.
The only thing that I think doesn't fit is that the selo appears to be from a time that is two or three decades later than the seller's aunt claims that her husband was given the bottle. A slight confusion in the aunt's recollection is far more likely than any speculation that this is a fake bottle.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: vintage port
+1DRT wrote:Personally, I think there is insufficient evidence for anyone to make a definitive claim that this bottle is anything other than what the seller claims it to be. I think the bottle looks genuine, the label looks genuine, it is probably vintage port (not a colheita) and is an ex-cellar release which is why it has a selo over the top of the capsule.
The only thing that I think doesn't fit is that the selo appears to be from a time that is two or three decades later than the seller's aunt claims that her husband was given the bottle. A slight confusion in the aunt's recollection is far more likely than any speculation that this is a fake bottle.
This looks like a perfectly genuine bottle to me. It is in all likelihood a Colheita, not a Vintage Port, the label's "vintage" notwithstanding. I believe that I have bottles in my cellar labeled "Vintage Reserve" or something similar that are most definitely what we now call Colheitas.
As Derek said, the only oddity in this case is the story about when it was received. And that's probably just an error of memory.
Glenn Elliott