Re: What are you standing in the cellar
Posted: 11:46 Sat 20 Apr 2013
Page 147 of the script says 1814.jdaw1 wrote:Never seen a ’14 before. Are you sure it wasn’t 1815?djewesbury wrote:1814 Madeira
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
Page 147 of the script says 1814.jdaw1 wrote:Never seen a ’14 before. Are you sure it wasn’t 1815?djewesbury wrote:1814 Madeira
Thank you DRT. I was certain my memory was correct on this occasion.. Doesn't Mycroft say something about it dating from the year before Waterloo..?DRT wrote:Page 147 of the script says 1814.jdaw1 wrote:Never seen a ’14 before. Are you sure it wasn’t 1815?djewesbury wrote:1814 Madeira
Not Rathbone, Robert Stephens. The campest Holmes ever. He was married to Maggie Smith, and channels Miss Jean Brodie all the way through, as one of the people I was with pointed out...LGTrotter wrote:Fantastic, Basil Rathbone in the lead?
DRT wrote:Page 147 of the script says 1814.
Which explains my non-acquaintance with it.The Script wrote:I have a treat for you -- a very old Madeira -- 1814. There are only six bottles left in the world. I have two of them, and am negotiating for a third.
This leaves three bottles unaccounted for. I'm expecting a full report..jdaw1 wrote:DRT wrote:Page 147 of the script says 1814.Which explains my non-acquaintance with it.The Script wrote:I have a treat for you -- a very old Madeira -- 1814. There are only six bottles left in the world. I have two of them, and am negotiating for a third.
Probably one of them was drunk at The Bell, a year I was abroad. Leaving only two.djewesbury wrote:This leaves three bottles unaccounted for. I'm expecting a full report..
Post a TN won't you, curious to hear what this is like..Andy Velebil wrote:It was standing for about 3 hours after I got it home from the store. Now it's open.... 2007 Quarles Harris LBV
I will prob follow this over a couple days..if it lasts that longdjewesbury wrote:Post a TN won't you, curious to hear what this is like..Andy Velebil wrote:It was standing for about 3 hours after I got it home from the store. Now it's open.... 2007 Quarles Harris LBV
Road Trip!mosesbotbol wrote:
'63 & 66 Grahams, need someone to help me drink them.
Oh.. just bought a few bottles of this. Hope yours is OK!gerwin.degraaf wrote:one of the bottles was/is showing signs of seepage (and rather a lot of it ).
Thanks, I'm hoping it is too! I will report back on how it turned out .djewesbury wrote:Oh.. just bought a few bottles of this. Hope yours is OK!gerwin.degraaf wrote:one of the bottles was/is showing signs of seepage (and rather a lot of it ).
It might be worth having a back-up. As well as the seepage problem, a lot of these bottles (even the "non-seepers") have serious VA problems. I have sore experience with this wine. But the nice bottles are really very nice.gerwin.degraaf wrote:To be opened coming Sunday (for my and my dad's Fathersday ): Niepoort 1997.
It'll be the first time I'll be opening such a youngster, but while opening my 6 botle case yesterday (in order to make some more room in my cellar, as bottles take up much less space than when still in the OWC), I found that one of the bottles was/is showing signs of seepage (and rather a lot of it ). So I'm hoping it will still give enjoyment coming Sunday !
Thanks for the tip Rob (should have thought of it myself as well of course!). I'll make sure to stand up a back-up bottle (I am tempted to take out a 1991 Q. de Vargellas to see where that one is in it's development). And even when the Niepoort 1997 turns out allright, it would be a bit of a hassle to lay the Vargellas down again of courseRAYC wrote:It might be worth having a back-up. As well as the seepage problem, a lot of these bottles (even the "non-seepers") have serious VA problems. I have sore experience with this wine. But the nice bottles are really very nice.gerwin.degraaf wrote:To be opened coming Sunday (for my and my dad's Fathersday ): Niepoort 1997.
It'll be the first time I'll be opening such a youngster, but while opening my 6 botle case yesterday (in order to make some more room in my cellar, as bottles take up much less space than when still in the OWC), I found that one of the bottles was/is showing signs of seepage (and rather a lot of it ). So I'm hoping it will still give enjoyment coming Sunday !
See this thread for the background where Andy V. quoted some interesting emails from Dirk N. about this wine.
It seems I've been lucky ! The bottle showed great (with an extended decant time at least). Will post a TN in a bit!gerwin.degraaf wrote:Thanks for the tip Rob (should have thought of it myself as well of course!). I'll make sure to stand up a back-up bottle (I am tempted to take out a 1991 Q. de Vargellas to see where that one is in it's development). And even when the Niepoort 1997 turns out allright, it would be a bit of a hassle to lay the Vargellas down again of courseRAYC wrote:It might be worth having a back-up. As well as the seepage problem, a lot of these bottles (even the "non-seepers") have serious VA problems. I have sore experience with this wine. But the nice bottles are really very nice.gerwin.degraaf wrote:To be opened coming Sunday (for my and my dad's Fathersday ): Niepoort 1997.
It'll be the first time I'll be opening such a youngster, but while opening my 6 botle case yesterday (in order to make some more room in my cellar, as bottles take up much less space than when still in the OWC), I found that one of the bottles was/is showing signs of seepage (and rather a lot of it ). So I'm hoping it will still give enjoyment coming Sunday !
See this thread for the background where Andy V. quoted some interesting emails from Dirk N. about this wine.
You win.jdaw1 wrote:A pre-WW2 bottle with signs of slight seepage, to be drunk in The Bell in December.