uncle tom wrote:As far as I can establish, the British bottlers not only used corks from Portugal, but may also have often had them supplied by the shippers, as the branding on corks from different bottlers is frequently identical.
I can't be absolutely sure that this was always the case, but it is apparent on the later English bottlings.
So why should OB corks be more prone to breaking, if they come from the same source?
It is possible that the best corks tended to go for export, and that the Wine Society at the time was sourcing its own corks; but here is another possibility..
As we all know, getting old corks out of ancient bottles is a bit of nightmare, as the waisted necks cause the corks to break. It's hard to tell for sure looking from the outside, but are the old Portuguese bottles slightly more waisted than the British ones?
Tom
Tom,
That is a very interesting quote from them. I am not 100% certain back then, but I would assume most of their corks would have been produced in Portugal. After all they make most of the natural corks in the world. and since it isn't specific to a certain year or a few years, as it's about a 30 year span, I would tend to agree with your statement
As we all know, getting old corks out of ancient bottles is a bit of nightmare, as the waisted necks cause the corks to break.
as being the most probable reason. Many old bottles had really flared necks where the cork expanded a lot inside the bottle. Making it nearly impossible to get them out in one piece with a corkscrew.