Stacking cases more efficiently

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Stacking cases more efficiently

Post by uncle tom »

As anyone who has any number of bottles knows, the mish-mash of port case designs can drive you up the wall when it comes to stacking them.

As I have a bit of re-stacking to do, I've taken a little time out to see if there's any clever way of doing this more efficiently.

Some observations..

It appears constructive to categorise case types, and stack birds of a feather together. The case types I've come up with are:

A - Six pack owcs packed with the bottles in opposing directions, the long dimension of the case being around 41cm

B - Six and twelve pack owcs with the bottles orientated in one direction only, with one case dimension that is 30-35cm

AB - Twelve pack owcs packed with the bottles in opposing directions, with a footprint of roughly 41cm x 30cm, and therefore stack compatible with either A or B

C - owcs, mostly for formats other than 75cL, that don't fit with either A or B

U - Useful cardboard cartons that are smaller than the owcs and can be fitted into odd corners.

If your stacking area is 2ft 6" deep (76cm) it is possible to have a stack of A sized cases stacked against the rear wall (end on) and a stack of B sized cases aligned with the front edge (or vice versa). The AB cases can be deployed to ensure both rows are the same height, and the U sized cases can fill odd corners and otherwise be fitted in at the top of the stack along with the awkward C cases.

To keep the cases steady and level, a supply of off-cuts of ply and timber can be tucked in where necessary when there are overlaps between cases of different heights.

So, great in theory - on paper it should enable me to stack with around 30% better density than I'm currently achieving with ad hoc stacking.

- But will it..?
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
JB vintage
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 222
Joined: 09:18 Fri 17 May 2013
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Stacking cases more efficiently

Post by JB vintage »

Stacks make FIFO (First In First Out) difficult though. I tend to want to use the older bottles at the bottom first and it is a lot of work to take out the bottom bottle from a stack, and thus I prefer to have the cases on shelves. When stacks are needed same size does save a lot of space and are much more stable. 30% better density is not at all unrealistic. I have a stack 2,2 m high without support, looks a bit risky but is actually quite stable. It is very space efficient, but I do not want to think of the day when I need the bottle in the bottom case.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Stacking cases more efficiently

Post by uncle tom »

Stacks make FIFO (First In First Out) difficult though. I tend to want to use the older bottles at the bottom first and it is a lot of work to take out the bottom bottle from a stack, and thus I prefer to have the cases on shelves. When stacks are needed same size does save a lot of space and are much more stable. 30% better density is not at all unrealistic. I have a stack 2,2 m high without support, looks a bit risky but is actually quite stable. It is very space efficient, but I do not want to think of the day when I need the bottle in the bottom case.
With the same thought in mind, I installed wide span racking in one bay last year, but was horrified by the loss of effective capacity. Aside from the thickness of the shelves - about 75mm on a 1500mm wide span with the requisite load capacity; the inconsistent height of cases leaves wasted space on every level, and further space is taken up by the uprights.

I therefore concluded that a better plan is to anticipate which cases will be wanted in the not too distant future, and ensure they are near the top of each stack, and then re-stack each bay every five years or so. I will keep the bay with the wide span shelving, but will reserve it for cases that I expect to open over the next year or two.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
JB vintage
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 222
Joined: 09:18 Fri 17 May 2013
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Stacking cases more efficiently

Post by JB vintage »

uncle tom wrote: 20:41 Mon 30 Jul 2018 re-stack each bay every five years or so. I will keep the bay with the wide span shelving, but will reserve it for cases that I expect to open over the next year or two.
No surprises in your home! That is an impressive long term planning!
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Stacking cases more efficiently

Post by uncle tom »

That is an impressive long term planning!
I find the long term aspect of port ownership is one of its more endearing qualities..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Post Reply