Glass Opacity

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
Christopher
Warre’s Warrior
Posts: 87
Joined: 14:24 Thu 17 Jan 2008
Location: London

Glass Opacity

Post by Christopher » 20:48 Sat 16 Sep 2017

This is a topic we have discussed before, the trend for shippers to use darker glass meaning fill levels cannot be determined.
This seems to me to have become more prevalent from the 1990's but I am sure there are members who have more knowledge here.
In a recent Sotheby's catalogue I noted a number of lots from the 1990's where written in the detail was ' Glass too dark to see levels' .
This in my view is extremely unfortunate and as these bottles get older and fill levels become more variable it is going to create serious issues for us as consumers.

1)I would be interested if anyone has any thoughts about how to try and work out the fill levels.
2) I am unsure why producers need to use such opaque glass ( I realise the reasons for darker glass ) and whether they could be encouraged to move back to glass that allows the consumer to know what they are buying, this must surely to be the benefit of producers as well.

DaveRL
Niepoort LBV
Posts: 277
Joined: 15:04 Tue 18 Mar 2014
Location: London

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by DaveRL » 07:43 Mon 18 Sep 2017

We could build a database of total weight and fill on opening. I think some of us already weigh bottles - perhaps this gives a start?

LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3684
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by LGTrotter » 20:07 Thu 28 Sep 2017

In answer to question 1 I would say that as the glass has got darker the lights have got brighter. I find that a fierce LED cuts through most glass, although I have not tried this with Vesuviuo bottles. I have also for the most part given up shining light through the bottle while decanting. I use a silver funnel with a pierced strainer that allows me to see the sediment coming. I also find that decanting the bottle without standing it seems to let the crust hold together better. I too am a bit nonplussed by the fashion for effectively black glass. A lot of the older bottles I have are the colour of modern wine bottles and the port inside does not seem to have come to any harm. I don't know if there are any producers who still use green bottles.

PhilW
Dow 1980
Posts: 2510
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by PhilW » 16:37 Fri 29 Sep 2017

Some bottles can certainly be tricky; while I have only ever come across 2 bottles for which I could not determine a level with my best torch for the purpose, I realise that many merchants and auctioneers are less motivated in finding the ideal torch and/or the time per bottle (for the torch it's not just about brightness, but also beam width, pattern and dispersion). I expect many manufacturers have simply used "as dark as possible without significant cost increase" on the grounds of maximum light protection.

There are other options which could be used reliably but most non-contact methods either expect to be in-vessel or be expensive such as laser/radar. Perhaps use of capacitance sensors might be possible fairly inexpensively.

Andy Velebil
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2478
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by Andy Velebil » 17:29 Fri 29 Sep 2017

1985 Dow's VP. Black as black can get and I couldn't see through the bottle I opened yesterday.

User avatar
Old Bridge
Warre’s Traditional LBV
Posts: 335
Joined: 11:33 Thu 22 Dec 2016
Location: Telemark, Norway

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by Old Bridge » 10:11 Sat 30 Sep 2017

Cálem Vintage Port 1985, just decanted, and the glass is very black. I can however see the light from a torch through the neck.

User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15020
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by DRT » 00:44 Wed 04 Oct 2017

Perhaps we are aiming too low in this world of technological advancement?

Could a device be developed that could "see" inside an unopened OWC to report back on the levels of each of the dozen bottles regardless of the opacity of the glass?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"

Ernest H. Cockburn

PhilW
Dow 1980
Posts: 2510
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by PhilW » 07:45 Wed 04 Oct 2017

I'd had the same thought. :)
I figured the options would likely be x-ray, ultra-wide-band, or perhaps a CT/MRI scanner (plus some clever algorithms to determine air volume to convert from side view to show level in a bottle when turned upright from imaging while on its side).

There does seem to be some interesting work out there on low-cost (lower resolution) x-ray and MRI. Some high-end auction houses might(?) already have access to such technology for other purposes, such as establishing authenticity for paintings/antiques?

(though a crowbar and decent torch is still a lot lower cost, and simpler to obtain)

User avatar
uncle tom
Dow 1980
Posts: 2776
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by uncle tom » 16:54 Thu 05 Oct 2017

Could a device be developed that could "see" inside an unopened OWC to report back on the levels of each of the dozen bottles regardless of the opacity of the glass?
I gave a lot of thought to this some years ago, and established that super powerful torches - even lasers - still fail to get through most opaque bottles. I have since settled on the practice of weighing and then re-weighing bottles a few years later.

This actually has an advantage over checking levels visually, as one is not then condemning bottles with sound closures whose only sin was to have a poor original fill.

However, if you wish to establish the level in an opaque bottle and don't have the odd spare million to invest in your own MRI, the most promising route I could establish - although I did not fully develop it.. - would be to have sprung calipers with a miniature ultrasonic transmitter and receiver attached.

If the receiver were then attached to an oscilloscope and the calipers were moved up and down the neck, the oscilloscope display should change when the signal was no longer deadened by the presence of fluid within the neck.

The biggest drawback though is that it would be difficult to get a meaningful reading between BN and VTS levels using this method.

Weighing bottles though is not that time consuming if you get yourself organised, and I don't find it any way a chore - in a strange way it enables you to 'know' your bottles better.

For weighing I use a laboratory balance designed for everyday school use, that weighs to an accuracy of 0.1g Although a longer interval is advantageous, it is possible to identify the weaklings in a case in as little as six months after the first weigh-in.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill

PhilW
Dow 1980
Posts: 2510
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by PhilW » 10:13 Fri 06 Oct 2017

While weighing is certainly viable for long term monitoring of bottles (and cases?) in your possession, I think the original post was more targeted at assessment of unknown bottles for potential purchase.

I also considered ultrasound, but there would be a number of problems and risks:
- with the speed of ultrasound in air being 10x faster than through glass or water, preventing the otherwise dominant indirect path in air around the bottle would be tricky (fastest and least attenuated) which would likely swamp the heavily attenuated paths through glass, and through glass+air or glass+wine. Sufficiently preventing the air path would be very difficult given the surface contact variation around the bottle shoulder/neck.
- the variation in bottle width around the locations of potential interest also complicates such single measurement, whether using attenuation or time of flight measurement, though use of a pair of stimulus and sensor above and below for detection rather than moving single sensor might mitigate this (this would apply equally to many sensor types, not just ultrasound).
- risk of glass breakage, especially if any chips or cracks in old bottles
- potential effect on the wine (especially the lees); consider that ultrasound is used to break down and separate organic material.

I like the challenge to make the task easier (and may do some tests with a capacitive sensor at some point if I can find a suitably small one), but come back to the fact that there is likely minimal commercial justification in creation of such a device unless it can be done at very low cost, given that there are very few bottles for which the level cannot be determined with tenacity and the right torch (combination of side, beam and power, not just power!).

User avatar
AHB
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11415
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by AHB » 12:50 Fri 06 Oct 2017

Couldn't you just tap the bottle, and when the sound of the tap changes you know that's where the level of the liquid is?
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Graham Stone Terraces 2015 and Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

User avatar
uncle tom
Dow 1980
Posts: 2776
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Glass Opacity

Post by uncle tom » 15:31 Fri 06 Oct 2017

My idea for ultrasound use was an upmarket variant of tapping the bottle - transmitting and receiving the sound via metal probes in contact with the glass, so as to reduce the scope for air transmission spoiling the reading.

The capacitative idea though is very interesting, as the dielectric properties of a filled neck and empty neck will differ. It should be possible to make the capacitance control a simple audio oscillator circuit, to create a rising and falling tone as a pair of probes pass the level in the bottle..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill

Post Reply