ThePortForum.com

Likewise I could call it Antidisestablishmentarianists' Corner. That’s always awkward. The corner could be used by one antidisestablishmentarianist (so ‟Antidisestablishmentarianist's”), but is intended for the use of many to discuss these things (‟Antidisestablishmentarianists'”, as you wrote, a...

Smiths was always too smooth for me — perhaps too Northern in its style. I like more bitter and more grip.

A gallon? The most beer I have ever seen a man drink before debladdering is twelve pints, on the Monopoly pub crawl. He admitted that it was a “long slash†.

Smaller picture done.

KillerB wrote:Thanks jdaw, having used these I can confirm that they are extremely useful.

Does that mean that you are using these at home, operated all by yourself? If so you are one of the few.

RonnieRoots wrote:Phew, for I while there I was afraid there were far more port lovers in this world than we previously knew of.

…with the commensurate affect on auction prices. Phew indeed.

It is possible to split threads; at least, I’ve seen it done elsewhere.

How much of this thread should be heaved overboard to Meaningless Drivel? (Clue: “none† is not the correct answer.)

Derek T. wrote:the original is around 600cm wide

I mis-read this first time. That’s huge!

KillerB wrote:send e-mails to everyone.

Where “everyone† means “everyone we actually know†, rather than everyone.

OK, we’re agreed. We do (or have already done) the cheap kosher things, and then let nature take its course.

Somewhere phpBB might allows settings for the HTML meta tags <title>…</title> <meta content="…" name=description> <meta content="…" name=keywords> where the ellipses should be set to the title of the thread, the first 180 characters of the first post, and the name of the thread ...

Sesquivertical

A term invented by yours truly. Like a double vertical, except that one of the houses is missing about half the years. From the Latin “sesqui-†, meaning one-and-a-half times.

Double vertical

Two houses from each of several years. E.g., Taylor 1908, Cockburn 1908, Taylor 1927, Cockburn 1927, Taylor 1963, Cockburn 1963, Taylor 1970, Cockburn 1970, Taylor 1985, Cockburn 1985. This can be thought of a a Taylor vertical, plus a Cockburn vertical, with matching years.

There are a variety of things. Somewhere phpBB might allows settings for the HTML meta tags <title>…</title> <meta content="…" name=description> <meta content="…" name=keywords> where the ellipses should be set to the title of the thread, the first 180 characters of the first pos...

[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=152#152]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:TPF is now listed in The Open Directory Project (though might take a few hours to appear). When google next takes a copy of the ODP’s free data it will appear in the Google directory. Both of these will help the search engine rankings.

I’m taking credit for that good news.

Firefox is fine with phpBB. I have used only Firefox on this BB—both Mac and PC.

Each browser has a single cookie cache, covering all open windows and tabs. So any one application can be only one ID.

Worst post-war port? Royal Oporto 1985.

Good reply.

Back to the main subject, please could other posters of TN consider themselves encouraged to include photographs of bottle, cork, and—most importantly—port.

Derek T. wrote:
9 in 10 are VP
I'd love to know what the 1 is?

E.g.

Derek T. wrote:I think there may be some port fairy's [sorry] out there who keep draining our decanters

You might or might not be a fairy, even of the port variety. But this is a family bulletin board so we don’t want to be told.

Whatever the taste, the Morgan 1991 seems to have a very distinctive affect on the mind. Much the same affect, as best I can tell at this distance, as a gin and tonic.

The following day, from an unchilled decanter that alas seemed to be empty after pouring but one glass: still a fine port with good tannins and mouth-fillingness. Better on day 1 though.

Because I fancy some port. Only reason. (You see, I always fancy some port. So that reasons hold true every time I open a bottle. Supplementary reasons include the wife fancying port, a port tasting, or just because I fancy some port. It’s really that easy.)

Nine in ten are VP.

It is an excellent avatar.
• It speaks of you and yours;
• It is stylish; and
• It is not so loud or moving as to distract a reader from the text.
Well done.

I would rather it were slightly narrower, but that would lose resolution so I’m not doing any of my usual grumbles.

Please could we have a photo or two?

No. Use Paint or like software to make your own avatar. Something that speaks distinctively of you or yours, rather than a child’s rendering of an explosion in a flag factory.

ThePortForum.com

Search found 23683 matches

Antidisestablishmentarianists' Corner

Smiths was always too smooth for me

Smaller picture done.

…with the commensurate affect on auction prices

It is possible to split threads; at least, I’ve seen it done

How much of this thread should be in Meaningless Drivel?

“the original is around 600cm wide†

Where “everyone† means “everyone we actually know†

SEO agreement

Fixing the meta tags isn’t dodgy

Sesquivertical

Double vertical

SEO

TPF on google

Firefox is fine with phpBB.

Worst post-war port? Royal Oporto 1985.

could other posters of TN consider themselves encouraged to…

Churchill White Porto

You might or might not be a fairy, even of the port variety.

M91 = G&T

RP85 at T+30H

Because I fancy some port. Only reason.

It is an excellent avatar. Well done.

Vesuvio bin label photo please

a child’s rendering of an explosion in a flag factory