ThePortForum.com

The date-sorted tasting-note index has moved to www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/date.html.

Alternatively see the alphabetical index at www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/alphabetical.html.

The date-sorted tasting-note index has moved to www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/date.html.

Alternatively see the alphabetical index at www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/alphabetical.html.

The date-sorted tasting-note index has moved to www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/date.html.

Alternatively see the alphabetical index at www.ThePortForum.com/Tasting_Notes/alphabetical.html.

Correction. Derek only wishes these to be swaped for buttons which sit outside posts or forums. Two examples are Reply and New Topic. These are currently white buttons on a white background, which makes them hard to identify as buttons. Buttons inside posts are white buttons on a coloured backgroun...

Can be done. What happens to “NV†s, and the likes of “20Y†. Or is the date thing only for dated things?

Currently buttons are: • usually white, with red writing and a black border; • except when hovering, when they become red with white writing and same black border. Derek wishes to swap these modes, so they are usually red with white writing, and when hovering become white with red writing. Before do...

"Joined" isn't that relevant on every post, once we get to know each other, and the PM/Email option could go to the right of the user name. If the PM etc buttons go to the right of the username, they make the name harder to read than if it stands on a line alone. So I don’t support that. ...

Tom: please could you email me or post a picture of the label?

Any chance of purging the final bits of ProSilver blueness (I’m thinking particularly of the Board Index image: http://theportforum.com/styles/ThePortForumRed/theme/images/icon_home.gif and the boarder of the text-box when replying to posts)? Missed these two, too: http://theportforum.com/styles/Th...

smws.co.uk/about/ wrote:The Scotch Malt Whisky Society began life some twenty years ago when a group of friends clubbed together to buy a cask of fine malt whisky. It took a few years before they opened their doors wider and today the Society has three superb venues and over 20,000 members worldwide.

TN index updated.

[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=17959#p17959]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:For the purposes of the about-to-be-updated TN index, is there any difference between “Kopke St Luis† and plain old “Kopke†?

For the purposes of the about-to-be-updated TN index, is there any difference between ‟Kopke St Luis” and plain old ‟Kopke”?

Benchmark Wine wrote:Broadbent Madeira 1964 ~ 2 @ $197
Cossart & Gordon Boal Solera 1845 ~ 1 @ $440 WS92 Fantastic fill!!
Warres Port 1970 1.5L ~ 1 @ $210 broken wax capsule, past sos, 4cm

Glenn E. wrote:I like the two alternating colors currently being used - I'll call them khaki and light khaki in case they change again.

Good names: khaki = #dfdfbf; light khaki = #e7e7cf.

Am I the only member of both :tpf: and SMWS ? Most of my whisky comes from the SMWS. The difference is that SMWS sell something that, until recently, was otherwise unavailable. Whisky, at cask strength, not chill filtered: just as it came out of the cask. Whisky is usually sold pre-diluted down to 4...

SushiNorth wrote:I've accepted I'm doomed. That sunday is August Moon, which means major gatherings, heirarchical squabbling, and vigorous activity.

Please speak clearly. Are you coming or nay?

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Still pale yellow on mine.
The change has found its way through to my screen. I don't like it either.

Reverted to white with yellow hovering.

It is still white on my screen. Have you backed it out? Still pale yellow on mine. No. I absolutely did not ask for the logo to be small. I asked for the text to be small because people sitting at desks 300 feet behind me in the office could read what site I was on. The logo should be larger than i...

DRT wrote:Could we just choose one of the background colours and use that on the Board Index?

Done, but I don’t like it.

DRT wrote:The TPF logo in the header should be larger at around 165% of its current size.

You wanted it small. Currently 32 by 32: choose a size 16n-by-16n for any integer n. Setting n=3 would be 50% larger in width and height, but 125% larger in area.

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Do #dfdfbf and #e7e7cf work for you? Distinct from each other and from white, yet still both pale yellow.
Done. OK?

Yes, done. And yes, OK with me. But are they OK with you?

Why does the Board Index not have the same background colour as the individual Forums and threads? This seems inconsistent with your view that some colours are too white. My objection isn’t to too white. It is that all non-white colours should be distinct from white. The board index is different to...

Do #dfdfbf and #e7e7cf work for you? Distinct from each other and from white, yet still both pale yellow.

f4f4e2 is too near white for me.

#e9e9c7 and #f4f4e2

ThePortForum.com

Search found 23632 matches

Tasting Note Index: Date

Tasting Note Index: Date, part 2

Tasting Note Index: Date

Re: New Style

Re: Tasting Notes Section

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: 1983 Kopke St Luis vintage port

Re: New Style

Re: A port wine society?

Re: Tasting Notes Section

Re: 1983 Kopke St Luis vintage port

Port for sale by Benchmark Wine

Re: New Style

Re: A port wine society?

Re: Double horizontal of ’83 and ’85, Melville, Sat 13 Sept ’08

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style

Re: New Style